1994
DOI: 10.1093/swr/18.1.56
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social network map: Some further refinements on administration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
46
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Cleak and Howe (2003), for example, define a social network as "all those people with whom we have ongoing relationships and through which individual people are linked into groups and society" (p.21). Tracy and Abell (1994) describe social networks as "the number and structure of relationships with others," while they define social support as "the amount and types of supportive exchanges that take place among network relationships" (p.56). Others have framed social support similarly, with Findler (2000) defining it as the extent to which an individual receives assistance and help (e.g.…”
Section: Social Capital As a Conceptual Model For Understanding Sociamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cleak and Howe (2003), for example, define a social network as "all those people with whom we have ongoing relationships and through which individual people are linked into groups and society" (p.21). Tracy and Abell (1994) describe social networks as "the number and structure of relationships with others," while they define social support as "the amount and types of supportive exchanges that take place among network relationships" (p.56). Others have framed social support similarly, with Findler (2000) defining it as the extent to which an individual receives assistance and help (e.g.…”
Section: Social Capital As a Conceptual Model For Understanding Sociamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A more realistic perspective is needed, as well as instruments that comprehensively assess the social networks of individuals. Simply assessing the structure of a clients' social network (e.g., size or number) provides little information about the quality, amount, and experience of positive and negative social interactions (Tracy and Abell 1994). For example, small networks may at first seem inadequate, but the client may perceive them as very supportive and have very few negative interactions with them.…”
Section: Implications For Social Work Practice and Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En effet, Tracy et Abell (1994) confirment que certaines données telles que la taille du réseau social ne sont pas en mesure de fournir une évaluation de la qualité et de la quantité de soutien social offert. À titre d'exemple, un réseau de petite taille peut procurer beaucoup plus de soutien qu'un très grand réseau.…”
Section: Le Soutien Social Perçuunclassified