1995
|
Sign up to set email alerts
Social inequalities and health among children aged 10–11 in The Netherlands: Causes and consequences
Search citation statements
Order By: Relevance
Paper Sections
Select...
42
5
2
1
Citation Types
1
19
0
2
Year Published
Range
1996
19962024
2024Publication Types
Select...
47
1
Relationship
0
48
Authors
Journals
Cited by 48 publications
(22 citation statements)
References 11 publications
1
19
0
2
Order By: Relevance
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Female children had poorer health than male children; the more siblings there are, the weaker the children’s health status; and children with good family economic conditions had higher level of health than those with poor family economic conditions. These findings are consistent with the conclusions of previous studies [8, 45], demonstrating that the children’s health level varies depending on gender, age, number of siblings, and family economic condition.…”
Section: Results
supporting
confidence: 93%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Female children had poorer health than male children; the more siblings there are, the weaker the children’s health status; and children with good family economic conditions had higher level of health than those with poor family economic conditions. These findings are consistent with the conclusions of previous studies [8, 45], demonstrating that the children’s health level varies depending on gender, age, number of siblings, and family economic condition.…”
Section: Results
supporting
confidence: 93%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…perceived health, identified only individuals in the most favourable situations in comparison with the rest. This might have led to a weakening of the social gradient associated with father's occupation as has been known from several previous studies [1,4].…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 84%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…[24][25][26]28,29,[34][35][36] Two studies give preference to the health selection explanation, 33,37 and seven studies attribute equal weight to social causation and health selection. [30][31][32][38][39][40][41] For household income (and related measures), we found three studies that thought social causation more important, 23,28,42 one study which gave preference to health selection, 43 and three studies which attributed equal importance. 27,32,41 For each of these three classical dimensions of SES, the majority of studies judged social causation to be more important than health selection, although several studies reached a conclusion of equal importance.…”
Section: Different Dimensions Of Ses and Health Indicators
mentioning
confidence: 87%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Female children had poorer health than male children; the more siblings there are, the weaker the children’s health status; and children with good family economic conditions had higher level of health than those with poor family economic conditions. These findings are consistent with the conclusions of previous studies [8, 45], demonstrating that the children’s health level varies depending on gender, age, number of siblings, and family economic condition.…”
Section: Results
supporting
confidence: 93%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…perceived health, identified only individuals in the most favourable situations in comparison with the rest. This might have led to a weakening of the social gradient associated with father's occupation as has been known from several previous studies [1,4].…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 84%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…[24][25][26]28,29,[34][35][36] Two studies give preference to the health selection explanation, 33,37 and seven studies attribute equal weight to social causation and health selection. [30][31][32][38][39][40][41] For household income (and related measures), we found three studies that thought social causation more important, 23,28,42 one study which gave preference to health selection, 43 and three studies which attributed equal importance. 27,32,41 For each of these three classical dimensions of SES, the majority of studies judged social causation to be more important than health selection, although several studies reached a conclusion of equal importance.…”
Section: Different Dimensions Of Ses and Health Indicators
mentioning
confidence: 87%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Female children had poorer health than male children; the more siblings there are, the weaker the children’s health status; and children with good family economic conditions had higher level of health than those with poor family economic conditions. These findings are consistent with the conclusions of previous studies [8, 45], demonstrating that the children’s health level varies depending on gender, age, number of siblings, and family economic condition.…”
Section: Results
supporting
confidence: 93%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…perceived health, identified only individuals in the most favourable situations in comparison with the rest. This might have led to a weakening of the social gradient associated with father's occupation as has been known from several previous studies [1,4].…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 84%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…[24][25][26]28,29,[34][35][36] Two studies give preference to the health selection explanation, 33,37 and seven studies attribute equal weight to social causation and health selection. [30][31][32][38][39][40][41] For household income (and related measures), we found three studies that thought social causation more important, 23,28,42 one study which gave preference to health selection, 43 and three studies which attributed equal importance. 27,32,41 For each of these three classical dimensions of SES, the majority of studies judged social causation to be more important than health selection, although several studies reached a conclusion of equal importance.…”
Section: Different Dimensions Of Ses and Health Indicators
mentioning
confidence: 87%