1996
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1098-2736(199610)33:8<821::aid-tea1>3.0.co;2-y
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
Social constructivism: Infusion into the multicultural science education research agenda
Abstract: This article focuses on (a) theoretical underpinnings of social constructivism and multicultural education and (b)
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
209
9
7
3
Citation Types
4
101
0
7
Year Published
1997
2026
Publication Types
Select...
130
53
38
2
Relationship
2
221
Authors
Journals
Cited by 222 publications
(112 citation statements)
References 21 publications
4
101
0
7
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…In addition, CBI's community focus and emphasis on social knowledge construction may allow women and ethnic minority students to better identify with the scientific enterprise and view themselves as active scientists. 50,51 These results also confirm the academic benefits of small-group, collaborative learning techniques for ethnic minority students observed previously in chemistry 52 and mathematics courses. 53 Collectively, results from this study indicate that CBI pedagogy shows promise for furthering America's goals of promoting national scientific literacy and both diversifying and expanding the STEM academic pipeline.…”
Section: ■ Discussion and Conclusion
supporting
confidence: 87%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…In addition, CBI's community focus and emphasis on social knowledge construction may allow women and ethnic minority students to better identify with the scientific enterprise and view themselves as active scientists. 50,51 These results also confirm the academic benefits of small-group, collaborative learning techniques for ethnic minority students observed previously in chemistry 52 and mathematics courses. 53 Collectively, results from this study indicate that CBI pedagogy shows promise for furthering America's goals of promoting national scientific literacy and both diversifying and expanding the STEM academic pipeline.…”
Section: ■ Discussion and Conclusion
supporting
confidence: 87%
“…CBI may provide women and ethnic minority students with educational context and support that is not available in a traditional, direct information-delivery course. In addition, CBI’s community focus and emphasis on social knowledge construction may allow women and ethnic minority students to better identify with the scientific enterprise and view themselves as active scientists. , These results also confirm the academic benefits of small-group, collaborative learning techniques for ethnic minority students observed previously in chemistry and mathematics courses …”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 81%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…This paradigm shift is based on the idea that people construct knowledge from those experiences and their interactions with others. Findings also confirm that SC is effective in the classroom as it helps students understand better what they are studying and how they can apply those concepts outside of the classroom (Atwater, 1996;. This also corroborates the argument of Kalpana (2014) that SC provides an opportunity for learners to be actively involved in learning instead of being passive receivers of information.…”
Section: Presentation Of Theory: Social Constructivism
supporting
confidence: 81%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…In the spring of 2016, he reported that his confidence in his ability to do science was limited, although he was not very concerned because he did not see science as an integral part of his job, his role in our partnership, or his needed skill set more generally. This perspective, which distances science from everyday matters, resulting in limited confidence in science, mirrors commonly held views of science, particularly among minoritized learners (Atwater, 1996; Bang & Marin, 2015; Lee, 2003) and suggests that he initially had a distanced disposition toward science:
The greatest challenge would probably be my own lack of confidence in those areas of science. .…”
Section: Results
supporting
confidence: 57%
