2005
DOI: 10.1007/11602569_50
| View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: Abstract.A snap-stabilizing protocol, starting from any configuration, always behaves according to its specification. Here, we present the first snap-stabilizing protocol for arbitrary rooted networks which detects if a set of nodes is a cutset. This protocol is based on the depth-first search (DF S) traversal and its properties. One of the most interesting properties of our protocol is that, despite the initial configuration, as soon as the protocol is initiated by the root, the result obtained from the compu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

3
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(25 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Various composition techniques have been introduced so far, e.g., collateral composition [15], fair composition [16], and conditional composition [17]; and many self-stabilizing algorithms actually are made as a composition of a silent spanning tree algorithm and another algorithm designed for tree topologies. For example, collateral, fair, and conditional compositions are respectively used the design of the algorithms given in [18], [19], and [20]. Notably, the silence property is not mandatory in such designs, however it allows to write simpler proofs [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies present snap-stabilizing token circulation protocols [30,16,18]. There also exists snap-stabilizing protocols for neighborhood synchronization [28], binary search tree construction [8] and cut-set detection [17]. Cournier et al [15] propose a method to add snap-stabilization to a large class of protocols.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Snap-stabilization has been also addressed to solve other problems in various contexts, e.g., computing binary search trees [16], cutset detection [17], neighborhood synchronization in trees [18], global synchronization in trees [19], committee coordination [20], computing prefix trees in Peer-to-peer systems [21], and linear message forwarding [22,23,24]. Notice that [24] constitutes the first attempt to deal with snap-stabilization in the context of dynamic networks.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%