2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2006.06.060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Smooth Nb surfaces fabricated by buffered electropolishing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
21
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
3
21
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference between the two pictures could be visualized easily. Actually, the rms roughness of the niobium surface treated by BEP will be about 20 times better than those treated by BCP [6]. In addition, in the process of taking pictures of them with MOM, sometimes it is much harder to focus on the BEP treated surface since it is so smooth as compared with that on BCP treated one.…”
Section: Effect Of Removed Thickness On Surface Roughness In Bepmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The difference between the two pictures could be visualized easily. Actually, the rms roughness of the niobium surface treated by BEP will be about 20 times better than those treated by BCP [6]. In addition, in the process of taking pictures of them with MOM, sometimes it is much harder to focus on the BEP treated surface since it is so smooth as compared with that on BCP treated one.…”
Section: Effect Of Removed Thickness On Surface Roughness In Bepmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the polishing rate of the traditional EP was another problem. It was only about 0:38 m= min [6]. So if a cavity is treated by the conventional EP, more than 6 hours is needed in order to remove the so-called surface damage layer of Nb.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, it was essential to study the oxide layer in detail. Slow sputtering using static SIMS approach [33,36,42] was adopted for such analysis. Using the above approach the intensity of various niobium oxide fragments of P78C (CS polished), P78B (CS+BCP treated), P78H…”
Section: Oxide Depth Profilementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used to believe that the thickness of the oxide layer was approximately 6 nm. However, the latest atomically resolved TEM cross-section images [10] show that the oxide layer is much thinner for BCP and buffered electropolishing [11] treated Nb samples. Most of the oxides in this top layer are Nb pentoxides that are dielectric and are generally believed to have no negative effects on the performance of Nb SRF cavities.…”
Section: Modifications Of Nb Surface Oxide Layer Structure By Gcibmentioning
confidence: 99%