“…However, as shown below the resulting estimates of elemental and bulk mass change produce a coherent picture of regolith development that is consistent with existing petrologic and clay mineralogic data and our knowledge of common fluid-rock interactions (e.g., Nettleton et al, 1970;Nesbitt, 1979;Nesbitt andYoung, 1984, 1989;Nesbitt and Markovics, 1997;White et al, 2001;Graham et al, 2010;Girty et al, 2014;Parizek and Girty, 2014). For instance, the transformation of biotite to vermiculite is widely recognized as a common alteration process occurring within the regolith, as is the translocation of clay particles (April et al, 1986;April et al, 2004;Aspandiar and Eggleton, 2006;Bisdom et al, 1982;Harraz and Hamdy, 2010;Jolicoeur et al, 2000;Nettleton et al, 1970;Wilson, 2004). Hence, our expectation is that mass balance calculations utilizing the selected framework elements will indicate that K mass has been lost from ZR I and ZR II, while the translocation of kaolinite (Al 2 Si 2 O 5 (OH) 4 ) into the saprock system at ZR III should have introduced an increase in Si and Al mass.…”