2016
DOI: 10.5195/tlp.2016.192
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Smartphones, Nude Snaps, and Legal Loopholes: Why Pennsylvania Needs to Amend its Revenge Porn Statute

Abstract: UGotPosted.com, SnapSext.com, SnapGFs.com, snapchatleaked.com, Huntermoore.tv, etc., are websites where you do not want to find your picture.  These websites are nonconsensual pornography websites.  If you do unexpectedly find an intimate image of yourself on one of these websites—or any other porn website for that matter— your best legal recourse is through your state’s revenge porn law.  However, if your state has yet to enact one, you might have to fight a legal battle in a notoriously grey area of the law.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
(2 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, future studies would ideally use more specific questions regarding the explicit content being viewed. Another possible limitation is that because the question about pornography use was only asked in the 2006 wave of PALS, participants would not yet have been exposed to smartphone technology, which was introduced in 2007 and has become a common medium for viewing pornography (Griffith 2016). Even so, Internet pornography was very much available at the time of PALS, and the reported use frequencies for men and women in PALS are very similar to those of other surveys fielded since 2012 (Perry and Hayward 2017; Regnerus etal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, future studies would ideally use more specific questions regarding the explicit content being viewed. Another possible limitation is that because the question about pornography use was only asked in the 2006 wave of PALS, participants would not yet have been exposed to smartphone technology, which was introduced in 2007 and has become a common medium for viewing pornography (Griffith 2016). Even so, Internet pornography was very much available at the time of PALS, and the reported use frequencies for men and women in PALS are very similar to those of other surveys fielded since 2012 (Perry and Hayward 2017; Regnerus etal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two-tier legal system necessitates constant referencing of federal and state law. 20 The former offers no regulations specific to the subject matter discussed here, while only selected states have decided to penalize it (Griffith 2016). They include New Jersey and California (Bustamante 2016; Sorensen 2017; Cooke 2017).…”
Section: Criminal Lawmentioning
confidence: 99%