2020
DOI: 10.1080/10408398.2020.1830262
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Smart traceability for food safety

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, a recent UK study identified the potential of remote sensing of environmental impact, big data analysis for environmental footprint accounting, and dynamic food procurement for creating a food system supportive of agroecology, although noted that sensitivity to context, farmer involvement and new governance processes are critical to achieving this (Cumulus Consultants, 2021). The potential of Procurement 4.0, and smart traceability as part of digital transformation in agriculture is equally gaining attention (Yu et al, 2020). However, overall the empirical evidence on the environmental gains achieved by digitalisation in agriculture, and the necessary governance arrangements needed to best support this transition, is still highly heterogeneous (Garske et al, 2021) and confirms that this is an important area for future research.…”
Section: Theme 5: Optimising Data and Technologies For Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, a recent UK study identified the potential of remote sensing of environmental impact, big data analysis for environmental footprint accounting, and dynamic food procurement for creating a food system supportive of agroecology, although noted that sensitivity to context, farmer involvement and new governance processes are critical to achieving this (Cumulus Consultants, 2021). The potential of Procurement 4.0, and smart traceability as part of digital transformation in agriculture is equally gaining attention (Yu et al, 2020). However, overall the empirical evidence on the environmental gains achieved by digitalisation in agriculture, and the necessary governance arrangements needed to best support this transition, is still highly heterogeneous (Garske et al, 2021) and confirms that this is an important area for future research.…”
Section: Theme 5: Optimising Data and Technologies For Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, similar technologies such as the Pathogen-annotated Tracking Resource Network system and the FoodChain-Lab software have been utilized for investigation of foodborne disease outbreaks that cross state, territory, and country borders (Gopinath et al, 2013;Weiser et al, 2016). Some emerging digital technologies such as cloud computing and the internet-of-things are also being explored to develop novel traceability systems for food safety (Yu et al, 2020). Hence, these advanced technologies can be integrated into the process of surveillance, which will eventually contribute to the shift from endpoint controls to risk-based food safety control in China.…”
Section: Variation On Major Foodborne Microbial Risks In Different Regionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Food safety has come to occupy an important place in food traceability [ 16 ]. The emergence of the Internet of Things (IoT) technology marked a watershed between the first and second generations of traceability systems, automatically identifying and tracking food through marker codes and using wireless networks for real-time monitoring, promoting digitization and electronic development, with the US, China, the EU, and Japan announcing IoT initiatives one after another, and the era of traceability information beginning to develop rapidly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%