Small is Beautiful: Evidence of an Inverse Relationship Between Farm Size and Yield in Turkey

Abstract

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. heterogeneity, a strong inverse relationship between farm size and yield is found to be prevalent in all regions of Turkey. The paper also investigates the impact of land fragmentation on productivity and labor input per acre, and finds a positive relationship. These results favor labor-centered theories that point to higher labor input per decare as the source of the inverse size-yield relationship. Terms of use: Documents in

Determinants of Yield Gap in Small-scale Apple Farms in Balochistan, Pakistan

“…The analysis of factors influencing the variation in yield gap within farmers' fields revealed an inverse size-yield relationship, implying that there was a tendency towards increasing yield gap with the increasing landholding size, which was attributed to an inverse relationship between landholding size and apple yield. This finding is consistent with the findings of the studies conducted elsewhere (Niroula and Thapa 2007;Ünal 2008;Sial et al 2012;Aneani and Ofori-Frimpong 2013). The inverse size-yield relationship is attributed to the fact that small farmers could take care of apple orchards properly by virtue of availability of higher household labor per unit of land.…”

Agriculture land resources and food security nexus in Punjab, Pakistan: an empirical ascertainment

“…However, Lahore and Mianwali districts were found middle ranked in the overall ranking of the districts in the province. The districts having a large number of small farmers, perhaps, have tilled more intensively as compared to others and have proven the decades' old famous concept of the inverse relationship in the agricultural sector (Unal, 2008). Table 4 describes the ranking of the percentage of land ownership titles (percent ALO) in all districts of the province.…”

“…As no such relationship could be found in the literature, specifically regarding Gini of operational land holdings and food insecurity, we may use farm productivity as a proxy of food security in relation to land inequality. Abundant literature is available expressing the negative impact of land inequality on farm productivity (Ali & Deininger, 2013;Anyaegbunam, Nto, & Madu, 2012;Mahmood & Jahnke, 2010;Unal, 2008) and (Vollrath, 2012), which contradicts the results of this particular model-I. Moreover, the results of percentage of land ownership titles are in line with the conclusions of Fedrer (1987) and Lee (2011) while the results of this study contradict Matchaya's (2010) conclusions, who found no evidence for the rise in farm productivity due to a rise in land ownership in Malawi.…”

Linking Land Distribution With Food Security: Empirical Evidence From Pakistan

“…However, no study could be traced in the literature outlinging the relationship of food security and Gini of operational farmland holding. However, if farm productivity or total factor productivity is regarded as proxy for food security, then abundant literature (Niroula and Thapa, 2005;Vollrath, 2006;Unal, 2008;Anyaegbunam et al, 2012;Ali and Deininger, 2015;Sheng et al, 2015) is available, indicating an inverse association between farm size and its corresponding productivity per unit area. In this context, operational farm holdings having a positive relationship with food security under brief study provides contrary evidence to these earlier studies.…”