2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7412.2004.05266.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Small Area Estimates for Cross-Classifications

Abstract: We develop a class of log-linear structural models that is suited to estimation of small area cross-classified counts based on survey data. This allows us to account for various associ- ation structures within the data and includes as a special case the restricted log-linear model underlying structure preserving estimation. The effect of survey design can be incorporated into estimation through the specification of an unbiased direct estimator and its associated covariance structure. We illustrate our approach… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…IPF or variations thereof of tabular estimates have been used extensively to reconcile row-and column-sums of table entries with fixed marginals (Bishop et al, 1975) (Li and Schreuder, 1985) and fit complex multivariate models that are consistent with known marginals (D'Agostino and Rubin, 2000;Zhang and Chambers, 2004;Cramer, 1998). However, IPF poses two drawbacks in the context of fitting a table to known marginals: i) a lack of analytically tractable estimators of variance of IPF-adjusted estimates, and ii) the frequent failure of IPF to satisfy constraints when a table (matrix) contain one or more zeroes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…IPF or variations thereof of tabular estimates have been used extensively to reconcile row-and column-sums of table entries with fixed marginals (Bishop et al, 1975) (Li and Schreuder, 1985) and fit complex multivariate models that are consistent with known marginals (D'Agostino and Rubin, 2000;Zhang and Chambers, 2004;Cramer, 1998). However, IPF poses two drawbacks in the context of fitting a table to known marginals: i) a lack of analytically tractable estimators of variance of IPF-adjusted estimates, and ii) the frequent failure of IPF to satisfy constraints when a table (matrix) contain one or more zeroes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Li and Schreuder (Li and Schreuder, 1985) provide a variant of IPF for constraining a table of tree stem volume estimates to pre-specified column and row totals. More recent IPF applications includes, fitting a multivariate Gaussian distribution to known marginals (Cramer, 1998;Fahrmeir et al, 1999), estimation of covariance proportionality factors in grouped normal distributions (Liu and Rubin, 1998;Zhang and Chambers, 2004), block updating of Gibbs sampler (Piccioni, 2000), and adjustments for missing covariates in retrospective studies (D'Agostino and Rubin, 2000). However, variance estimators of IPF constrained estimates have not been forthcoming.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…random sampling; e.g. simulated annealing (Kongmuang 2007), linear programming models (Zhang and Chambers 2004), complex combinatorial optimisation methods (Ballas et al 2006)] or deterministic [i.e. rule based – if A then B; e.g.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the search area becomes larger, the procedure of searching for the k th tree around the sample point (Batcheler, Craib 1985) becomes time-consuming. According to Zhang and Chambers (2004), censoring to a maximum search distance requires a likelihood approach to the estimation in order to handle the censoring correctly, and a large sample size is required for an accurate estimate of the proportion of censored samples (Magnussen et al 2011). Such a burden eliminates any practical advantage of this method over sampling with fixed area plots.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%