1994
DOI: 10.1063/1.868245
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Small amplitude theory of Richtmyer–Meshkov instability

Abstract: This paper presents a new analysis of small amplitude Richtmyer–Meshkov instability. The linear theory for the case of reflected rarefaction waves, a problem not treated in previous work, is formulated and numerically solved. This paper also carries out a systematic comparison of Richtmyer’s impulsive model to the small amplitude theory, which has identified domains of agreement as well as disagreement between the two. This comparison includes both the reflected shock and reflected rarefaction cases. Additiona… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

14
207
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 194 publications
(221 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
14
207
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The accuracy of the model sensibly improves when the post-shocked quantities a + 0 and A + t are employed (Richtmyer 1960). A discussion on the agreement and disagreement between compressible linear theory, based on the linearization of the Euler equations in one space dimension, and the impulsive model was discussed in (Velikovich and Dimonte 1996;Yang et al 1994). Large eddy and direct numerical simulations can greatly benefit from comparing the numerical results with theoretical results, including zero-order, linear, weakly nonlinear and highly nonlinear theories, similar to Stanic et al (2012).…”
Section: The Richtmyer-meshkov Instabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accuracy of the model sensibly improves when the post-shocked quantities a + 0 and A + t are employed (Richtmyer 1960). A discussion on the agreement and disagreement between compressible linear theory, based on the linearization of the Euler equations in one space dimension, and the impulsive model was discussed in (Velikovich and Dimonte 1996;Yang et al 1994). Large eddy and direct numerical simulations can greatly benefit from comparing the numerical results with theoretical results, including zero-order, linear, weakly nonlinear and highly nonlinear theories, similar to Stanic et al (2012).…”
Section: The Richtmyer-meshkov Instabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…42 The difference is that in the latter case, we have one unstable eigenmode that is regular at 0 t + → . There is a single radial eigenmode that describes the instability development, and all the studies of the classical RMI focus on it; [42][43][44] δ makes it possible to use the log-log scale, illustrating the rapid decay of these perturbations ensured by the large negative real parts of n σ . Frequency of the oscillations is seen to increase with n as a result of the increased imaginary part of n σ .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such simulations exploit the fact that the base state is a self-similarly evolving solution with a finite number of waves (a transmitted shock, a contact discontinuity, and either a reflected shock or a reflected rarefaction). The reflected and transmitted waves usually bound the computational domain for computing the linear quantities [3]. Analytical extensions of the linear stability analysis when the base state is more complicated than the one considered by Richmyer and Yang et alhave not been performed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Richtmyer analyzed with the interaction of a shock wave with a perturbed contact discontinuity separating gases of different densities and concluded that the perturbations on the contact discontinuity grew linearly with time. The linear analysis was further developed by Yang et al [3] in which they also considered the case when the reflected wave is a rarefaction. Computing the linear response for both the reflected shock and reflected rarefaction cases requires special consideration for each case, and a different set of equations must be solved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%