2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00024-010-0219-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Slip Distribution of the 1963 Great Kurile Earthquake Estimated from Tsunami Waveforms

Abstract: The 1963 great Kurile earthquake was an underthrust earthquake occurred in the Kurile-Kamchatka subduction zone. The slip distribution of the 1963 earthquake was estimated using 21 tsunami waveforms recorded at tide gauges along the Pacific and Okhotsk Sea coasts. The extended rupture area was divided into 24 subfaults, and the slip on each subfault was determined by the tsunami waveform inversion. The result shows that the largest slip amount of 2.8 m was found at the shallow part and intermediate depth of th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The estimated size of the rupture area of the 1973 earthquake (80 km 9 80 km) was obtained from the tsunami waveform inversion where the slip amount was larger than 1.0 m. The 1963 Kurile earthquake occurred northeast of the 1969 earthquake. Slip distribution of the 1963 earthquake was estimated using tsunami waveform data and the total seismic moment of 3.9 9 10 21 Nm (M w 8.3) was estimated from slip distribution (Ioki and Tanioka 2011). The estimated rupture area having a slip amount of more than 1.0 m was 300 km 9 150 km.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The estimated size of the rupture area of the 1973 earthquake (80 km 9 80 km) was obtained from the tsunami waveform inversion where the slip amount was larger than 1.0 m. The 1963 Kurile earthquake occurred northeast of the 1969 earthquake. Slip distribution of the 1963 earthquake was estimated using tsunami waveform data and the total seismic moment of 3.9 9 10 21 Nm (M w 8.3) was estimated from slip distribution (Ioki and Tanioka 2011). The estimated rupture area having a slip amount of more than 1.0 m was 300 km 9 150 km.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These events considered in [7,8], also parameters of those source models reviewed in [9,10,11]. The exact match of observed and simulated tsunami heights is not necessary, as shown in [12] only height ratio estimates are enough for the point where tsunami height is known.…”
Section: Extension Of Recurrence Function To the Adjacent Areas Of Thmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To conduct detailed simulations in bays of Shikotan Island and refine calculation in Yuzhno-Kurilskaya Bay and Kitoviy Bay of Iturup Island the 15-arcsecond grid has been interpolated for coupling with digitized bathymetries of bays to 2-arcsecond resolution. The seismological finite-fault data of tsunamigenic earthquakes were taken from USGS and articles devoted to old events of 1958-1994 [15,9,10,11,16]. After carrying out calculations of the propagation of all significant tsunamis, the numerical waveforms in each point along the isobath of about 8 m were processed with a special transformation allowing one to estimate the wave height on the shore with assumption the one-dimensional nonlinear rolling.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Numerical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ioki and Tanioka (2011) obtained the slip distribution of the 1963 Etorof earthquake (M8.2) by using the tsunami data. The quiescence area is well matched with the subfaults with the slip of 0.5 m or larger obtained by Ioki and Tanioka (2011). It is not clear whether this seismic quiescence ended or not.…”
Section: Characteristic Of Seismic Quiescencementioning
confidence: 99%