2023
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sleep hygiene strategies for individuals with chronic pain: a scoping review

Abstract: ObjectivesUp to a quarter of the world’s population experience chronic pain, which, in addition to interfering with daily activities and waking function, is often associated with poor sleep. Individuals experiencing poor sleep are often encouraged to implement sleep hygiene strategies. However, current sleep hygiene strategies have not been developed considering the unique challenges faced by individuals with chronic pain and therefore they might not be as effective in this population. The aim of this scoping … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Strategies that improve sleep can help with pain management in the general population [64]; however, to our knowledge there are no trials that have evaluated the effects of interventions for sleep on pain in PwP. Strategies that could be considered include cog-nitive behavioral therapy and sleep hygiene [64][65][66]. Overall, acupuncture, massage and sleep therapies require methodologically robust investigation with consideration of the biopsychosocial nature of pain when designing the intervention and outcomes.…”
Section: Other Non-pharmacological Treatmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strategies that improve sleep can help with pain management in the general population [64]; however, to our knowledge there are no trials that have evaluated the effects of interventions for sleep on pain in PwP. Strategies that could be considered include cog-nitive behavioral therapy and sleep hygiene [64][65][66]. Overall, acupuncture, massage and sleep therapies require methodologically robust investigation with consideration of the biopsychosocial nature of pain when designing the intervention and outcomes.…”
Section: Other Non-pharmacological Treatmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Com isto avaliamos a dor no primeiro, segundo e terceiro mês.Os resultados compararão entre as variáveis da escala BIP avaliada em 3 tempos, observa-se que existem diferença significativa p-valor >0,005 entre os tempos para as variáveis nos dois grupos: Número Pior Dor Grupo AL p 0,003 e Grupo AL + corticoide 0,002 Número Dor Mais Fraca Grupo AL p 0,018 e Grupo AL + corticoide 0,035 Número Dor Média grupo anestésico local p 0,003 e Grupo AL + corticoide 0,001 Intensidade Dor Grupo AL p 0,003 e Grupo AL + corticoide 0,002. Sendo isto favorável e ratificando ao ESP como fator protetor para cronificação da dor em estes pacientes, Krakowski 2021(131) Ao mesmo tempo para variável Sono grupo anestésico local p 0,016 e Grupo AL + corticoide 0,010, mostraram-se significativas para ambos os grupos, quer dizer que os pacientes tiveram adequada higiene do sono ajudando assim a diminuição da dor crônica (132)…”
unclassified