Skeletal and dental movements after anterior maxillary advancement using implant-supported distraction osteogenesis in dogs

Maxillary anterior segmental distraction osteogenesis to correct maxillary hypoplasia and dental crowding in cleft palate patients: a preliminary study

“…The skeletal movement (VRL–A) was 86% (4.66 mm/5.45 mm) of the incisor movement (VRL–U1) during distraction. This ratio was equal to that in a study performed by Block et al with a bone-borne device [ 5 ]. Ho et al and Cakmak et al reported skeletal movement ratios of 70 and 62% with a tooth-borne device [ 17 , 23 ].…”

“…After a total of 14 days of distraction, the consolidation period was started and lasted for three months. The distraction protocol was referred to the study of Block et al and Dolanmaz et al [ 5 , 11 ]. At the end of this period, the distractor was removed, and postoperative orthodontic treatment began at the same time.…”

Maxillary anterior segmental distraction osteogenesis to correct maxillary hypoplasia and dental crowding in cleft palate patients: a preliminary study

“…The skeletal movement (VRL–A) was 86% (4.66 mm/5.45 mm) of the incisor movement (VRL–U1) during distraction. This ratio was equal to that in a study performed by Block et al with a bone-borne device [ 5 ]. Ho et al and Cakmak et al reported skeletal movement ratios of 70 and 62% with a tooth-borne device [ 17 , 23 ].…”

“…After a total of 14 days of distraction, the consolidation period was started and lasted for three months. The distraction protocol was referred to the study of Block et al and Dolanmaz et al [ 5 , 11 ]. At the end of this period, the distractor was removed, and postoperative orthodontic treatment began at the same time.…”

Orthodontically guided bone transport in the treatment of alveolar cleft: A case report

“…The main advantage of tooth-supported transport is that the segment is transported following the direction of the dental arch, generating a maxillary bone with a normal curvature. Some studies have observed that in dentally-supported transporters the dental movement is greater than that of the bone ( 1 , 2 ). However, studies such as that of Liou et al ( 3 ) observed the opposite.…”

Anterior maxillary segmental distraction for correction of maxillary hypoplasia and dental crowding in cleft palate patients: a preliminary report

“…BLOCK et al 4 use two different devices to examine AMSD in two experimental studies on dogs. Their results suggest that AMSD using skeletal anchored devices resulted in more reliable advancement of the premaxilla than tooth-borne distractors.…”

Maxillary anterior segmental distraction osteogenesis to correct maxillary hypoplasia and dental crowding in cleft palate patients: a preliminary study

“…The skeletal movement (VRL–A) was 86% (4.66 mm/5.45 mm) of the incisor movement (VRL–U1) during distraction. This ratio was equal to that in a study performed by Block et al with a bone-borne device [ 5 ]. Ho et al and Cakmak et al reported skeletal movement ratios of 70 and 62% with a tooth-borne device [ 17 , 23 ].…”

“…After a total of 14 days of distraction, the consolidation period was started and lasted for three months. The distraction protocol was referred to the study of Block et al and Dolanmaz et al [ 5 , 11 ]. At the end of this period, the distractor was removed, and postoperative orthodontic treatment began at the same time.…”

Orthodontically guided bone transport in the treatment of alveolar cleft: A case report

“…The main advantage of tooth-supported transport is that the segment is transported following the direction of the dental arch, generating a maxillary bone with a normal curvature. Some studies have observed that in dentally-supported transporters the dental movement is greater than that of the bone ( 1 , 2 ). However, studies such as that of Liou et al ( 3 ) observed the opposite.…”

Anterior maxillary segmental distraction for correction of maxillary hypoplasia and dental crowding in cleft palate patients: a preliminary report

“…BLOCK et al 4 use two different devices to examine AMSD in two experimental studies on dogs. Their results suggest that AMSD using skeletal anchored devices resulted in more reliable advancement of the premaxilla than tooth-borne distractors.…”

Maxillary anterior segmental distraction osteogenesis to correct maxillary hypoplasia and dental crowding in cleft palate patients: a preliminary study

“…The skeletal movement (VRL–A) was 86% (4.66 mm/5.45 mm) of the incisor movement (VRL–U1) during distraction. This ratio was equal to that in a study performed by Block et al with a bone-borne device [ 5 ]. Ho et al and Cakmak et al reported skeletal movement ratios of 70 and 62% with a tooth-borne device [ 17 , 23 ].…”

“…After a total of 14 days of distraction, the consolidation period was started and lasted for three months. The distraction protocol was referred to the study of Block et al and Dolanmaz et al [ 5 , 11 ]. At the end of this period, the distractor was removed, and postoperative orthodontic treatment began at the same time.…”

Orthodontically guided bone transport in the treatment of alveolar cleft: A case report

“…The main advantage of tooth-supported transport is that the segment is transported following the direction of the dental arch, generating a maxillary bone with a normal curvature. Some studies have observed that in dentally-supported transporters the dental movement is greater than that of the bone ( 1 , 2 ). However, studies such as that of Liou et al ( 3 ) observed the opposite.…”

Anterior maxillary segmental distraction for correction of maxillary hypoplasia and dental crowding in cleft palate patients: a preliminary report

“…BLOCK et al 4 use two different devices to examine AMSD in two experimental studies on dogs. Their results suggest that AMSD using skeletal anchored devices resulted in more reliable advancement of the premaxilla than tooth-borne distractors.…”