2009
DOI: 10.1590/s0102-09352009000700008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: RESUMOCaracterizou-se a brucelose bovina em Mato Grosso por meio de um estudo transversal realizado em 2003 para auxiliar na implementação do Programa Nacional [7.4-13.1%], respectively. In the productive regions, the prevalence of infected herds were 36.9% [29.2-45.2%], 27.2% [22.8-32.1%], 40.4% [38.8-46.2%], and 50.3% [44.5-56

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0
25

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
2
23
0
25
Order By: Relevance
“…Additional parameters for dimensioning the economic impact of bovine brucellosis in Brazil is the fact the total losses of about 892.7 million Reais is roughly equivalent to a little more than one billion liters of milk or more than 500 thousand fattened steers for slaughter. A comprehensive model was developed in this study, which was based on reliable epidemiological data (Alves et al 2009, Azevedo et al 2009, Rocha et al 2009, Chate et al 2009, Negreiros et al 2009, Klein-Gunnewiek et al 2009, Villar et al 2009, Marvulo et al 2009, Sikusawa et al 2009, Ogata et al 2009, Minervino et al 2011, on sound clinical parameters (Bernués et al 1997), and on scientifically determined economic variables appropriate for dairy (Lucas 2006) or beef cattle (Jorge Jr et al 2006). This model has an intermediate level of stringency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additional parameters for dimensioning the economic impact of bovine brucellosis in Brazil is the fact the total losses of about 892.7 million Reais is roughly equivalent to a little more than one billion liters of milk or more than 500 thousand fattened steers for slaughter. A comprehensive model was developed in this study, which was based on reliable epidemiological data (Alves et al 2009, Azevedo et al 2009, Rocha et al 2009, Chate et al 2009, Negreiros et al 2009, Klein-Gunnewiek et al 2009, Villar et al 2009, Marvulo et al 2009, Sikusawa et al 2009, Ogata et al 2009, Minervino et al 2011, on sound clinical parameters (Bernués et al 1997), and on scientifically determined economic variables appropriate for dairy (Lucas 2006) or beef cattle (Jorge Jr et al 2006). This model has an intermediate level of stringency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Brazilian National Program for Control and Eradication of Brucellosis and Tuberculosis has recently provided detailed epidemiological data covering most of the cattle population in the country (Poester et al 2009), including the states of Bahia (Alves et al 2009), the Federal District ), Espírito Santo (Azevedo et al 2009), Goiás (Rocha et al 2009), Minas Gerais , Mato Grosso do Sul (Chate et al 2009), Mato Grosso (Negreiros et al 2009), Paraná , Rio de Janeiro (Klein-Gunnewiek et al 2009), Rondônia (Villar et al 2009), Rio Grande do Sul (Marvulo et al 2009), Santa Catarina (Sikusawa et al 2009), Sergipe ), São Paulo ) e Tocantins (Ogata et al 2009). In addition, recent epidemiological data from the State of Pará has been included in the present study (Minervino et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A frequência de fêmeas bovinas soropositivas constatada no presente trabalho (4,1%) também pode ser considerada alta dada a meta de erradicação da doença, e encontra-se dentro da variação das prevalências obtidas em outros estados brasileiros (0,06% a 10,2%) (alveS et al, 2009;azevedo et al, 2009;chate et al, 2009;diaS et al, 2009a;gonçalveS et al, 2009a;gonçalveS et al, 2009b;Klein-gunnewieK et al, 2009;Marvulo et al, 2009;negreiroS et al, 2009;ogata et al, 2009;rocha et al, 2009;SiKuSawa et al, 2009;Silva et al, 2009;villar et al, 2009).…”
Section: Análise Dos Dadosunclassified
“…Até o momento, os inquéritos foram conduzidos em 15 Estados, e as prevalências de animais soropositivos variaram de 0,06%, em Santa Catarina, a 10,2%, em Mato Grosso (alveS et al, 2009;azevedo et al, 2009;chate et al, 2009;diaS et al, 2009a;diaS et al, 2009b;gonçalveS et al, 2009a;gonçalveS et al, 2009b;Klein-gunnewieK et al, 2009;Marvulo et al, 2009;negreiroS et al, 2009;ogata et al, 2009;rocha et al, 2009;SiKuSawa et al, 2009;Silva et al, 2009;villar et al, 2009 …”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Bovine brucellosis, caused by Brucella abortus, is present in all Brazilian regions (PAULIN; FERREIRA NETO, 2003) with a prevalence of 0.32% for property and 0.06% for animals in the state of Santa Catarina (SIKUSAWA et al, 2009) and >40% for farms and 10% for seropositive animals in the states of Mato Grosso do Sul and Mato Grosso (CHATE et al, 2009;NEGREIROS et al, 2009), showing heterogeneous distribution prevalence among states and even in regions within some states.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%