Fast protein folding involves complex dynamics in many degrees of freedom, yet microsecond folding experiments provide only low-resolution structural information. We enhance the structural resolution of the five-helix bundle protein λ 6-85 by engineering into it three fluorescent tryptophan-tyrosine contact probes. The probes report on distances between three different helix pairs: 1-2, 1-3, and 3-2. Temperature jump relaxation experiments on these three mutants reveal two different kinetic timescales: a slower timescale for 1-3 and a faster one for the two contacts involving helix 2. We hypothesize that these differences arise from a single folding mechanism that forms contacts on different timescales, and not from changes of mechanism due to adding the probes. To test this hypothesis, we analyzed the corresponding three distances in one published single-trajectory all-atom molecular-dynamics simulation of a similar mutant. Autocorrelation analysis of the trajectory reveals the same "slow" and "fast" distance change as does experiment, but on a faster timescale; smoothing the trajectory in time shows that this ordering is robust and persists into the microsecond folding timescale. Structural investigation of the all-atom computational data suggests that helix 2 misfolds to produce a short-lived off-pathway trap, in agreement with the experimental finding that the 1-2 and 3-2 distances involving helix 2 contacts form a kinetic grouping distinct from 1 to 3. Our work demonstrates that comparison between experiment and simulation can be extended to several order parameters, providing a stronger mechanistic test.fluorescence | helix bundle | protein folding | thermal denaturation | molecular dynamics T he mechanism of protein folding is one of the central questions in biological science (1). The first all-atom simulation to capture substantial protein-refolding dynamics, which lasted 1 μs, was published in 1998 (2). Since then, the timescales of protein folding achieved experimentally and computationally have met (3). Advances in computation now produce distributed (4) and single-trajectory (5) protein-folding simulations on the same nanosecond-to-millisecond timescale as the fastest folding experiments.With rich computational data becoming available, experimental testing of simulations is now hampered by the difficulty of acquiring experimental structural data with microsecond or faster time resolution. Fast ensemble and single-molecule experiments commonly probe only one order parameter such as the fluorescence lifetime of a single tryptophan residue, a broad infrared (IR) spectral response, or one Förster resonant energy transfer (FRET) efficiency (3). Fortunately, a quantitative comparison of such experimental order parameters with simulations is now possible: for example, solventaccessible surface area of tryptophan can serve as a proxy for experimentally detected fluorescence (6), or computed 2D-IR spectra can track secondary structure (7). Still, a single-order parameter, even when compared accurately, canno...