2009
DOI: 10.1785/0120080238
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Site Amplifications Observed in the Gubbio Basin, Central Italy: Hints for Lateral Propagation Effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
40
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
6
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Fäh et al (2001) this finding is a consequence of the moderate velocity contrast between the bedrock and the overlaying soft sediments, as observed in this area by Lombardo et al (2001) from ambient noise measurements. Moreover, the vertical component could be strongly affected by local amplification effects when pronounced heterogeneities characterize the local geology (Riepl et al 1998;Raptakis et al 1998Raptakis et al , 2000Triantafyllidis et al 1999;Bindi et al 2009). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Fäh et al (2001) this finding is a consequence of the moderate velocity contrast between the bedrock and the overlaying soft sediments, as observed in this area by Lombardo et al (2001) from ambient noise measurements. Moreover, the vertical component could be strongly affected by local amplification effects when pronounced heterogeneities characterize the local geology (Riepl et al 1998;Raptakis et al 1998Raptakis et al , 2000Triantafyllidis et al 1999;Bindi et al 2009). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This wide amplification can be traced back to a number of causes, i.e. a low impedance contrast, some irregular underground interfaces or in general 2-D or 3-D effects as well as the effects of locally induced surface waves as observed by Bindi et al (2009bBindi et al ( , 2011b at sites located on alluvial basins. Since the village of Pretare is built on the deposits of an ancient landslide, with a varying laterally thickness, and we do not observe any evidence of significant surface wave contribution in the recordings, we can just hypothesize that this amplification is due to the local heterogeneity of the underground structure.…”
Section: Spectral Amplificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The HVSR method has been used for site effects assessment in various geomorphological cases and microzonation studies (e.g Chavez-Garcia et al 1995;Teves-Costa et al 1996;Bard 1998;Mucciarelli et al 2003a;Cara et al 2003;Bindi et al 2009;Beroya et al 2009;Gallipoli et al 2011;Strollo et al 2011;Puglia et al 2011;Mucciarelli 2011). HVSR has been also applied in several Basins indicating the contribution of the local geomorphology on seismic ground motion (e.g Teves-Costa et al 1996;Gueguen et al 2000;Lebrun et al 2001;Gosar 2007;Bonnefoy-Claudet et al 2008;Özalaybey et al 2011 ;).…”
Section: Brief Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strollo et al (2011) for the case study of microzonation in Potenza (Italy) compared HVSR, SSR and GIT and found good correlation of the results while at one site the differences in the amplification was ascribed to the amplification in the vertical component. Bindi et al 2009 applied time-frequency analysis in earthquake data recorded in Gubbio Basin (Italy) and showed the dispersive behavior of the large amplitudes arrivals after the S-waves which suggested the contribution of the locally generated Rayleigh waves in determining large ground motion amplitude of the vertical component. 2D/3D effects of the Gubbio Basin inserted locally generated Basin-induced waves which amplify the vertical component and affect the HVSR amplitude.…”
Section: Fig11mentioning
confidence: 99%