2018
DOI: 10.5705/ss.202015.0293
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Singular prior distributions in Bayesian D-optimal design for nonlinear models

Abstract: For Bayesian D-optimal design, we define a singular prior distribution for the model parameters as a prior distribution such that the determinant of the Fisher information matrix has a prior geometric mean of zero for all designs. For such a prior distribution, the Bayesian D-optimality criterion fails to select a design. For the exponential decay model, we characterize singularity of the prior distribution in terms of the expectations of a few elementary transformations of the parameter. For a compartmental m… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We evaluate a design ξ via its Bayesian efficiencies under a given criterion, relative to an appropriate reference design ξ ∗ (see, for example, the work of Waite). Under robust D s ‐optimality, this efficiency is given by eff(ξ,ξ)=expBlogdetM11(ξ,γ)M12(ξ,γ)M221(ξ,γ)M12T(ξ,γ˜)dF(γ)expBlogdetM11(ξ,γ)M12(ξ,γ)M221(ξ,γ)M12T(ξ,γ)dF(γ)1/s. We find designs that maximize and numerically using a version of the Fedorov‐Wynn algorithm,) as implemented in R package docopulae…”
Section: Designs For Copula‐based Marginal Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We evaluate a design ξ via its Bayesian efficiencies under a given criterion, relative to an appropriate reference design ξ ∗ (see, for example, the work of Waite). Under robust D s ‐optimality, this efficiency is given by eff(ξ,ξ)=expBlogdetM11(ξ,γ)M12(ξ,γ)M221(ξ,γ)M12T(ξ,γ˜)dF(γ)expBlogdetM11(ξ,γ)M12(ξ,γ)M221(ξ,γ)M12T(ξ,γ)dF(γ)1/s. We find designs that maximize and numerically using a version of the Fedorov‐Wynn algorithm,) as implemented in R package docopulae…”
Section: Designs For Copula‐based Marginal Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This criterion follows as a special case of the D A -criterion with A T = (I s 0 s×(r+l−s) ), where I s is the s × s identity matrix and 0 s×(r+l−s) is the s × (r + l − s) zero matrix. We evaluate a design via its Bayesian efficiencies under a given criterion, relative to an appropriate reference design * (see, for example, the work of Waite 32 ). Under robust D s -optimality, this efficiency is given by…”
Section: Design Of Experiments For Copula Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This criterion follows as a special case of the D A -criterion with A T = (I s 0 s×(r+l−s) ), with I s the s × s identity matrix and 0 s×(r+l−s) the s × (r + l − s) zero matrix. We evaluate a design ξ via its Bayesian efficiencies under a given criterion, relative to an appropriate reference design ξ * (see, for example, Waite, 2018). Under robust D s -optimality, this efficiency is given by:…”
Section: Design Of Experiments For Copula Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The adoption of bounded uniform prior distributions prevents the occurrence of parameter vectors in the support of the prior for which no design has a non-singular information matrix (c.f. Waite, 2015).…”
Section: Designs and Model Selection For Binomial Response And Logistmentioning
confidence: 99%