1966
DOI: 10.1007/bf02710419
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Singular hypersurfaces and thin shells in general relativity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

34
2,866
0
12

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2,848 publications
(2,936 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
34
2,866
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…(3) we have underlined the term whose presence makes braneworld theory different from general relativity. (It should perhaps be mentioned that the variation of action (1) which includes the Gibbons-Hawking surface term brane K leads to the Israel junction conditions [20] on the brane, as demonstrated in [14,15].) From (3) one can show that there exists a scale whose value determines the domain in which general relativity is approximately valid [12,21].…”
Section: Basic Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3) we have underlined the term whose presence makes braneworld theory different from general relativity. (It should perhaps be mentioned that the variation of action (1) which includes the Gibbons-Hawking surface term brane K leads to the Israel junction conditions [20] on the brane, as demonstrated in [14,15].) From (3) one can show that there exists a scale whose value determines the domain in which general relativity is approximately valid [12,21].…”
Section: Basic Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thin shells in General Relativity are modeled by using the well-known Darmois-Israel [42][43][44] formalism. The junction conditions allow to match two solutions onto a hypersurface under different conditions, for example the interior and exterior solutions corresponding to stars, galaxies, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, by using the distributional approach [46][47][48] or the junction conditions on the extrinsic curvature of thin shells [49][50][51], the Einstein-Maxwell equations yield an energymomentum tensor T ab = T elm ab + T mat ab , where T mat ab = Q ab δ(z), and a current density J a = j a δ(z) = −2e 2(Ψ−Λ) A a,z δ(z), where δ(z) is the usual Dirac function with support on the disk. T elm ab is the electromagnetic tensor defined in Eq.…”
Section: Electrovacuum Rotating Relativistic Thin Disksmentioning
confidence: 99%