2002
DOI: 10.1002/0471142905.hg0106s32
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single‐Sperm Typing

Abstract: This unit presents protocols for sperm isolation using two different methods, amplification of simple sequence-length polymorphisms (SSLP) and/or single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) from single cells or whole genome-amplified single cells using primer extension preamplification (PEP), and discusses the statistical analysis of sperm-typing recombination data. Newer methods for studying recombination over very short distances (a few kilobases) using total sperm DNA and allele-specific PCR are also discussed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Single-sperm typing strategies can provide a wide sweep for active hot spots along a chromosome. However, only intervals where the totality of all hot spot activity has a discernible impact on recombination intensity will be identified since high accuracy with current single-sperm methods is laborious and expensive [for details see (4,20,42,100)]. …”
Section: Facsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Single-sperm typing strategies can provide a wide sweep for active hot spots along a chromosome. However, only intervals where the totality of all hot spot activity has a discernible impact on recombination intensity will be identified since high accuracy with current single-sperm methods is laborious and expensive [for details see (4,20,42,100)]. …”
Section: Facsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Significantly more than two loci (in one case, 17 and, in the other, 32) have been amplified from a single sperm (Lien et al 2000;Pramanik and Li 2002). The single-sperm typing method, including technical details and possible errors (Li et al 1991;Cullen and Carrington 2001;Lien et al 2002), has been reviewed elsewhere.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%