Springer Praxis Books
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-37672-0_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single light scattering: computational methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
9

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
0
14
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…It is usually performed for particles of simple shapes (infinite cylinders or homogeneous spheroids) and the particles are very often assumed to be perfectly aligned (Mathis 1986;Kim & Martin 1995;Draine & Fraisse 2009). The reasons for these simplifications are a poor knowledge of alignment mechanisms (see Lazarian 2009, for a recent review) and the impossibility of light scattering calculations for complex aggregate particles of intermediate and large sizes (Michel et al 1996;Farafonov & Il'in 2006;Borghese et al 2007;Min 2009). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is usually performed for particles of simple shapes (infinite cylinders or homogeneous spheroids) and the particles are very often assumed to be perfectly aligned (Mathis 1986;Kim & Martin 1995;Draine & Fraisse 2009). The reasons for these simplifications are a poor knowledge of alignment mechanisms (see Lazarian 2009, for a recent review) and the impossibility of light scattering calculations for complex aggregate particles of intermediate and large sizes (Michel et al 1996;Farafonov & Il'in 2006;Borghese et al 2007;Min 2009). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the problem under consideration the separation of variables is possible as concern the azimuthal angle ϕ (see [3]), and hence in the first case one should consider only the terms with the index m = 0, while in the second one only the terms with m = 1.…”
Section: Scalar Potential Expansionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that Eqs. (4)-(5) are analogs of the integral equations arisen when the method is applied to wave problems (see, e.g., [3]). Eqs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 We should point out that the SVM and the EBCM, as well as the point-matching method (PMM), 12 must be equivalent from the theoretical viewpoint; however, when they are numerically implemented, there are ultimately no clear essential differences between them. [13][14][15] Electrostatic boundary-value problems, especially in the case of particles that possess no symmetry, are convenient tests for further research in these important methods of light-scattering theory. 16 Along with the rigorous approach to solving electrostatics problems, the uniform-internal-field approximation was recently constructed, which made it possible to find simple approximate formulas for certain axisymmetric particles, including finite circular cylinders 17 and Chebyshev particles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%