I start this issue by introducing the fi rst fruits of a major new venture for ESPL. We have trialled 'State-of-the-Science' papers since 2007. After some discussion, we are now making these articles a regular feature of the fi rst issue of the journal in each calendar year. One of the major reasons for doing this was the success of the very fi rst State-of-the-Science article, by Paul Bishop (Bishop, 2007) which went on to win the Wiley Award for the Best Paper published in Earth Surface Processes and Landforms in 2007. Paul's article showed the critical role for articles that are not only reviews, but which also reframe and reformulate our current understanding of key geomorphological questions. Our editorial commitment to these papers is now becoming more ambitious and we plan to have a number of them in the fi rst issue of each calendar year. Thus, I am pleased to introduce seven such articles in 2010. Chiverrell et al. (2010) show how a combination of new dating methods and statistical analyses question apparent cross-correlations between river terrace sequences. In so doing, they show the need to rethink sediment dynamics using new dating techniques. Codilean et al. (2010) Ne, as a means of quantifying bedrock erosion rates. Tucker and Hancock (2010) provide a complementary assessment of how our theoretical understanding of landscape change is being represented in landscape evolution models, and how in turn this just evolve. At a much fi ner scale, Kocurek et al. (2010) argue for the need to understand the interactions between bedforms and their environment if we are to understand the diverse range of emergent bedform types in fl uvial and aeolian environments. Two more of these papers address ecological issues. Rice et al. (2010) demonstrate the gain in shared understanding that derives from interdisciplinary working, in this case between river ecologists and fl uvial geomorphologists, that refl ects wider interest in the mutual interactions and feedbacks between physical and biological processes. Reinhardt et al. (2010) also illustrate these interactions, demonstrating the need for us to think of the co-evolution of geomorphological and ecological systems and processes, and refl ecting an intriguing re-framing of earth system science questions discussed elsewhere in this journal (e.g. Corenblit and Steiger, 2009). Finally, Kleinhans (2010) has provided us with a very valuable extra-terrestrial perspective on geomorphological processes, by focusing on the fl uvio-deltaic systems of Mars. Whilst we can be certain that elements of these are associated with water, Kleinhans identifi es how some of the critical and emerging questions regarding these landforms might be addressed through innovative combination of experimental, remote sensing and theoretical analyses.