2017
DOI: 10.1038/ismej.2016.190
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single-cell transcriptomics of small microbial eukaryotes: limitations and potential

Abstract: Single-cell transcriptomics is an emerging research tool that has huge untapped potential in the study of microbial eukaryotes. Its application has been tested in microbial eukaryotes 50 μm or larger, and it generated transcriptomes similar to those obtained from culture-based RNA-seq. However, microbial eukaryotes have a wide range of sizes and can be as small as 1 μm. Single-cell RNA-seq was tested in two smaller protists (8 and 15 μm). Transcript recovery rate was much lower and randomness in observed gene … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(15 reference statements)
0
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A bacterial cell in the sunlit and relatively nutrient rich seawater has on average 200-2000 mRNA molecules per cell 7 , and levels in subsurface microbes should be even lower given the extreme energy limitation 8 . In contrast, eukaryotic phytoplankton have relatively large genomes and a single cell can have up to 50,000 mRNA molecules 9 , and thus it would only take nucleic acids from small number of contaminating eukaryotic phytoplankton from seawater to swamp an entire metatranscriptome sequencing run on such low biomass samples.…”
Section: Main Textmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A bacterial cell in the sunlit and relatively nutrient rich seawater has on average 200-2000 mRNA molecules per cell 7 , and levels in subsurface microbes should be even lower given the extreme energy limitation 8 . In contrast, eukaryotic phytoplankton have relatively large genomes and a single cell can have up to 50,000 mRNA molecules 9 , and thus it would only take nucleic acids from small number of contaminating eukaryotic phytoplankton from seawater to swamp an entire metatranscriptome sequencing run on such low biomass samples.…”
Section: Main Textmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…fraction of two or more cells encapsulated together), and (v) the possibility to obtain phenotypic information to further identify and select/filter cells ( figure 1c,d). Singlecell pipetting with microcapillary tubes, manually or using automated devices, is the simplest yet probably the most widely used approach to isolating single eukaryotic cells for diversity and ecological studies [14][15][16]36]. Albeit slow and tedious, accurate observation of cells under the microscope is sometimes essential to find the target cells in complex communities where only morphological information is available for cell identification.…”
Section: (B) Isolation Of Single Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…B 374: 20190098 (qPCR) [14,42]. However, the restrictive cell size ranges of these chips [40] can be a limiting factor for cells out of the size range [14] or for a mixture of cells of very different sizes. Other limitations of the C1 system are the low throughput (tens to hundreds of cells) and high cost.…”
Section: (B) Isolation Of Single Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most current methodologies are restricted to polyadenylated transcripts, losing information on small noncoding RNAs and some long noncoding RNAs ( 93 ). Transcript recovery rates can be low, even for deep sequencing ( 94 ), and the low RNA content in small microbes can further diminish recovery ( 95 ). The decision of whether to examine large numbers of cells at a low sequence depth or small numbers of cells at an increased depth depends very much on the motivation for the experiment ( 93 , 96 ), yet carefully designed experiments with these limitations in mind are still revealing.…”
Section: Transcriptomic Studies Of Malariamentioning
confidence: 99%