2015
DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggv072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simultaneous seismic data interpolation and denoising with a new adaptive method based on dreamlet transform

Abstract: Interpolation and random noise removal is a prerequisite for multichannel techniques because the irregularity and random noise in observed data can affect their performances. Projection Onto Convex Sets (POCS) method can better handle seismic data interpolation if the data's signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is high, while it has difficulty in noisy situations because it inserts the noisy observed seismic data in each iteration. Weighted POCS method can weaken the noise effects, while the performance is affected by … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Methods based on time-frequency denoising [20,21] form a large class of seismic denoising techniques. In this approach, noisy time series are first transformed into the timefrequency domain using a time-frequency transform, such as a wavelet transform [22,23,24,25,26,27], Short Time Fourier Transform (STFT) [28], S-transform [29], curvelet transform [30,31,32], dreamlet transform [33], contourlet zhuwq@stanford.edu transform [34], shearlet transform [35], empirical mode decomposition [36,37,38,37,39,40], etc. The resulting timefrequency coefficients are modified (thresholded) to attenuate the coefficients associated with noise and to find an estimate of the signal coefficients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methods based on time-frequency denoising [20,21] form a large class of seismic denoising techniques. In this approach, noisy time series are first transformed into the timefrequency domain using a time-frequency transform, such as a wavelet transform [22,23,24,25,26,27], Short Time Fourier Transform (STFT) [28], S-transform [29], curvelet transform [30,31,32], dreamlet transform [33], contourlet zhuwq@stanford.edu transform [34], shearlet transform [35], empirical mode decomposition [36,37,38,37,39,40], etc. The resulting timefrequency coefficients are modified (thresholded) to attenuate the coefficients associated with noise and to find an estimate of the signal coefficients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; Xue, Ma and Chen ; Wang et al . ; Yu, Ma and Osher ) and so on. Of the numerous methods, however, very few can handle non‐uniformly sampled data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Sparse transform based approaches first transform seismic data to a sparse domain (Sacchi & Ulrych 1995;Wang et al 2015b;Chen 2017;Huang et al 2017b), then apply soft thresholding to the coefficients, finally transform the sparse coefficients back to the time-space domain. Widely used sparse transforms are Fourier transform (Pratt et al 1998;Naghizadeh & Sacchi 2011;Zhong et al 2014;Wang et al 2015a;Li et al 2016d;Shen et al 2016), curvelet transform (Candès et al 2006;Hermann et al 2007;Neelamani et al 2008;Liu et al 2016e;Zu et al 2016), seislet transform Chen & Fomel 2015a;Gan et al 2015b,c;Liu et al 2015;Gan et al 2016c;Liu et al 2016f), seislet frame transform Gan et al 2015aGan et al , 2016b, shearlet transform (Kong et al 2016;Liu et al 2016a), Radon transform (Sacchi & Ulrych 1995;Xue et al 2014;Sun & Wang 2016;Xue et al 2016bXue et al , 2017, different types of wavelet transforms (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%