1998
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-0488(19981130)36:16<2911::aid-polb6>3.0.co;2-z
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

Simultaneous kinetic and microdielectric studies of some epoxy-amine systems

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
28
5
2
1

Citation Types

4
19
0
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
24
4
3
2

Relationship

1
32

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 33 publications

(23 citation statements)
references

References 18 publications

4
19
0
0
Order By: Relevance
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The MeEt-MDA and DiEt-MDA mixtures had much higher peak exotherms that were 53–62 and 61–70 °C higher than the corresponding MDA mixtures, respectively. These results are consistent with the previous studies on DGEBA and DiEt-MDA , which showed longer gelation times than the corresponding MDA -cured network. , The higher peak exotherms and correspondingly lower reactivity of the MeEt-MDA and DiEt-MDA mixtures are due to a combination of steric hindrance near the aniline functional group, as well as a dilution of the reactive functional groups in the mixtures with increasing hydrophobic content.…”
Section: Results
supporting
confidence: 92%
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The MeEt-MDA and DiEt-MDA mixtures had much higher peak exotherms that were 53–62 and 61–70 °C higher than the corresponding MDA mixtures, respectively. These results are consistent with the previous studies on DGEBA and DiEt-MDA , which showed longer gelation times than the corresponding MDA -cured network. , The higher peak exotherms and correspondingly lower reactivity of the MeEt-MDA and DiEt-MDA mixtures are due to a combination of steric hindrance near the aniline functional group, as well as a dilution of the reactive functional groups in the mixtures with increasing hydrophobic content.…”
Section: Results
supporting
confidence: 92%
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…As can be seen in Figure 8, the divergence of the η * magnitude occurs at about 250 min, which is in good agreement with the gelation time reported for the DGEBA/MCDEA system 44–46. Moreover, although not shown here in order to avoid repeatable data, this time also agrees with that determined by us from DSC measurements (following the protocol described in ref 44–4644, 46 by fitting the experimental conversion evolution to the model used by Eloundou et al46 at 140 and 160 °C (obtaining similar values for the different constants45, 46).…”
Section: Results
supporting
confidence: 87%
“…It is well known that the simplest method for the estimation of gelation times from rheological measurements is the divergence of the complex viscosity 43. As can be seen in Figure 8, the divergence of the η * magnitude occurs at about 250 min, which is in good agreement with the gelation time reported for the DGEBA/MCDEA system 44–46. Moreover, although not shown here in order to avoid repeatable data, this time also agrees with that determined by us from DSC measurements (following the protocol described in ref 44–46…”
Section: Results
supporting
confidence: 86%
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Network A had the highest T G followed by networks C and B , while network D had the lowest T G . The T G for network B as measured by DSC (154 °C) was similar to the predicted fully cured T G for a network prepared from MDEA and DGEBA (165 °C) . For comparison, the T G of the networks was also measured via TMA and is reported as the peak loss temperature.…”
Section: Results
supporting
confidence: 60%