2013
DOI: 10.1002/fld.3797
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of two‐phase flow–body interaction problems using direct forcing/fictitious domain–level set method

Abstract: SUMMARYIn the present paper, a direct forcing/fictitious domain (DF/FD)–level set method is proposed to simulate the twophase flow–body interaction. The DF/FD does not sacrifice accuracy and robustness by employing a discrete δ (Dirac delta) function to transfer quantities between the Eulerian nodes and Lagrangian points explicitly as the immersed boundary method. The advantages of this approach are the simple concept, the easy implementation and the utilization of original governing equation without modificat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(103 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other numerical studies based on the LS-IB combination include two-dimensional wave-body interaction (Yoon et al, 2013), bubble adherence (Son, 2005), and three-dimensional jet atomization (Arienti and Sussman, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other numerical studies based on the LS-IB combination include two-dimensional wave-body interaction (Yoon et al, 2013), bubble adherence (Son, 2005), and three-dimensional jet atomization (Arienti and Sussman, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particularly, efforts have been made in the context of liquid-gas flows with particles [8][9][10][11][12]. Apart from the method, numerical investigations on the binary interaction of particles and droplets are rather scarce, unlike the droplet-droplet collisions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where the M , J ω, u c , f c and t c are the mass, inertia tensor, angular velocity, centre mass velocity, force and torque applied on the rigid object, respectively. The fluid-rigid coupling is commonly achieved by a direct forcing approach [7,12,13,14]. It introduces the Lagrangian coordinates for the rigid body and solves the additional set of Eq.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The general advantage of these methods is the consideration of the rigid body dynamics in a Eulerian way, analogous to a fluid, facilitating the modelling of rigid and fluid coupling problems by means of the two-phase flow approach described above. In contrast with the previous direct forcing approach [8,7,13,14], the inertias of the rigid body is fully accounted for the fluid solver. This method [7,13,20] have been applied to simulate single phase particulate flows or self-propelling immersed bodies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%