2022
DOI: 10.1007/s12524-022-01590-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of Land Surface Temperature Patterns Over Future Urban Areas—A Machine Learning Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the realm of data analytics, ML is one of the most successful techniques for making predictions using models and algorithms (Angra and Ahuja, 2017;Dhall et al, 2020). Although there is a paucity of research employing ML algorithm to retrieve LST, the technique has been used in other aspects of LST studies, such as spatial downscaling, simulation, addressing meteorological conditions, and similar tasks (Li et al, 2019;Buo et al, 2021;Maithani et al, 2022;Xu et al, 2021). Wang et al, (2022) employed land cover categories and Landsat bands to estimate the LST across the Tibetan plateau using random forest (RF).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the realm of data analytics, ML is one of the most successful techniques for making predictions using models and algorithms (Angra and Ahuja, 2017;Dhall et al, 2020). Although there is a paucity of research employing ML algorithm to retrieve LST, the technique has been used in other aspects of LST studies, such as spatial downscaling, simulation, addressing meteorological conditions, and similar tasks (Li et al, 2019;Buo et al, 2021;Maithani et al, 2022;Xu et al, 2021). Wang et al, (2022) employed land cover categories and Landsat bands to estimate the LST across the Tibetan plateau using random forest (RF).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LST by the RF trained model was the most accurate with the lowest root mean square error (RMSE) (1.89 Kelvin), according to Wang et al, who also obtained and examined the LST from the single channel technique, the linear regression model (2.77 Kelvin), and the moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer product (MOD11A1) (3.62 Kelvin). In order to acquire the LST over Dehradun using an artificial neural network, Maithani et al, (2022) employed built-up densities with a mean absolute error of 1.5° C and 0.9° C, while Rana and Suryanarayana (2022) employed four ML techniques, K nearest neighbour, neural network, regression tree, support vector machine incorporating three indices resulting with an RMSE of 0.54° C, 0.59° C, 0.89° C, and 0.61° C respectively. Mohammad et al, (2022) predicted the LST over a city in Ahmedabad with an RMSE of 0.03° C using XGB regressor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are different approaches and algorithms for LST calculation using Landsat imagery. Du et al [ 21 ] developed a practical split-window algorithm to estimate LST from thermal infrared sensor (TIRS) aboard Landsat 8, obtaining LST with an accuracy better than 1.0 K; Maithani et al [ 22 ] retrieved LST from Landsat thermal datasets using a single-channel algorithm for the Dehradun planning area situated in Uttarakhand (India); Yu et al [ 23 ] compared three different approaches for LST inversion from TIRS, including the radiative transfer equation-based method, the split-window algorithm, and the single-channel method. Their findings indicated that the LST obtained from the radiative transfer equation-based method, using Landsat band 10, has the highest accuracy with RMSE lower than 1.0 K, while the split-window algorithm has moderate accuracy and the single-channel method has the lowest accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%