2011
DOI: 10.1504/ijep.2011.038437
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of flow in an idealised city using various CFD codes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [22] validation results according the VDI guideline VDI 3783 / 9 [23] is shown. [24] and [25] used the MUST data set for evaluation, testing with other data sets was performed by [26]. The vegetation model of MISKAM was evaluated by [27] and [28].…”
Section: Numerical Setup 31 the Miskam Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [22] validation results according the VDI guideline VDI 3783 / 9 [23] is shown. [24] and [25] used the MUST data set for evaluation, testing with other data sets was performed by [26]. The vegetation model of MISKAM was evaluated by [27] and [28].…”
Section: Numerical Setup 31 the Miskam Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MUST dataset has been used extensively in the formulation and validation of digital models (e.g., Brook et al, 2003;Milliez and Carissimo, 2007;Santiago and Martilli, 2007;Goricsan et al, 2007). While Goricsan et al (2007) compared the windfields generated by WinMISKAM to those measured on site during the MUST campaign, and Milliez and Carissimo (2007) analysed the concentration predictions of the CFD code Mercure Saturne (Archambeau et al, 2004) against MUST observations, no-one has yet compared concentration predictions by WinMISKAM against the MUST data.…”
Section: A C C E P T E D Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While Goricsan et al (2007) compared the windfields generated by WinMISKAM to those measured on site during the MUST campaign, and Milliez and Carissimo (2007) analysed the concentration predictions of the CFD code Mercure Saturne (Archambeau et al, 2004) against MUST observations, no-one has yet compared concentration predictions by WinMISKAM against the MUST data.…”
Section: A C C E P T E D Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The values of FAC2 = 1, NMSE = 0.030 and FB = 0.068 reveal a good fit between computed and experimental data with a slight underestimation. Therefore, the pollutant dispersion is accurately simulated in base to the model acceptance criteria established for NMSE < 1.5 and −0.3 < FB < 0.3 in Chang and Hanna (2005) and as a threshold of the correlation coefficient R > 0.8 in Goricsán et al (2011) (Table 3).…”
Section: Cfd Model Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%