2013
DOI: 10.1145/2451236.2451243
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulating liquids and solid-liquid interactions with lagrangian meshes

Abstract: This paper describes a Lagrangian finite element method that simulates the behavior of liquids and solids in a unified framework. Local mesh improvement operations maintain a high-quality tetrahedral discretization even as the mesh is advected by fluid flow. We conserve volume and momentum, locally and globally, by assigning each element an independent rest volume and adjusting it to correct for deviations during remeshing and collisions. Incompressibility is enforced with per-node pressure values, and extra d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
66
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 105 publications
1
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The uid nature of liquids and gases results in immense shape changes throughout the course of a simulation. Consequently, despite various advantages possessed by Lagrangian mesh-based approaches to uid simulation [Clausen et al 2013;Misztal et al 2014], such as a uni ed physical model for solid and uids, better volume preservation, and straightforward support for implicit surface tension, they are less common because they necessitate continuous and expensive remeshing of the uid region. Many solids, on the other hand, are not ordinarily subject to such extreme distortion and permanent deformation.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The uid nature of liquids and gases results in immense shape changes throughout the course of a simulation. Consequently, despite various advantages possessed by Lagrangian mesh-based approaches to uid simulation [Clausen et al 2013;Misztal et al 2014], such as a uni ed physical model for solid and uids, better volume preservation, and straightforward support for implicit surface tension, they are less common because they necessitate continuous and expensive remeshing of the uid region. Many solids, on the other hand, are not ordinarily subject to such extreme distortion and permanent deformation.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, while conforming meshes simplify the pressure projection, their use in Eulerian schemes does not inherently resolve interpolation and advection issues near thin boundaries. In contrast to Eulerian methods, purely Lagrangian methods that rely on conforming tetrahedralizations of both fluid and solid are also possible (MISZTAL et al, 2010;CLAUSEN et al, 2013), and may better avoid these issues; again, this does not appear to have been studied.…”
Section: Thin Solid Boundariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such methods seek to maintain an optimal number of elements and thus achieve reasonable performance. Adaptive remeshing has proven useful for simulating thin sheets such as cloth [Narain et al 2012], paper [Narain et al 2013], as well as elastoplastic solids [Wicke et al 2010] and solid-fluid mixtures [Clausen et al 2013]. More general basis refinement approaches have also been suggested [Debunne et al 2001;Grinspun et al 2002].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%