2006
DOI: 10.1175/jtech1903.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulated Doppler Velocity Signatures of Evolving Tornado-Like Vortices

Abstract: Doppler radar observations have revealed a class of atmospheric vorti-ces (tropical cyclones, tornadoes, dust devils) that possess elliptical radar reflectivity signatures. One famous example is Typhoon Herb (1996) that maintained its elliptical reflectivity structure over a 40-hour period. Theoretical work and dual-Doppler analyses of observed tropical cyclones have suggested two physical mechanisms that can explain the formation of two types of elliptical vortices observed in nature, namely, the combination … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was assumed that the cross-section of the wind tunnel was crucial for the correct analysis of the results; therefore, its parameters (hereinafter referred to as boundary conditions) were checked in detail, and the stress values were compared. To accurately compare the results depending on the boundary conditions, the stress reading locations have been changed, and their [31,32] The study involved creating a wind tunnel model, initially in the shape of a horizontal cylinder, in which one of the circular bases was modeled as an air inlet while the opposite one was modeled as an outlet. A model of the analyzed building was placed centrally in the tunnel.…”
Section: Scheme Of the Conducted Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was assumed that the cross-section of the wind tunnel was crucial for the correct analysis of the results; therefore, its parameters (hereinafter referred to as boundary conditions) were checked in detail, and the stress values were compared. To accurately compare the results depending on the boundary conditions, the stress reading locations have been changed, and their [31,32] The study involved creating a wind tunnel model, initially in the shape of a horizontal cylinder, in which one of the circular bases was modeled as an air inlet while the opposite one was modeled as an outlet. A model of the analyzed building was placed centrally in the tunnel.…”
Section: Scheme Of the Conducted Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The general analysis scheme, along with the first assumptions, is presented in Figure 4. [31,32] The study involved creating a wind tunnel model, initially in the shape of a horizontal cylinder, in which one of the circular bases was modeled as an air inlet while the opposite one was modeled as an outlet. A model of the analyzed building was placed centrally in the tunnel.…”
Section: Scheme Of the Conducted Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parameters V 0 and R for V1 and V2 are calculated from LIDAR measurements at the lowest sweep (z ~260 masl), V 0 varies in time for each vortex and R is set equal to the mean core radius of each, which is 480 m (R is constant rather than varying in time owing to uncertainties in its measurement using LIDAR observations). K = 1.2564, a theoretical value calculated by Davies-Jones and Wood (2006) and adopted in Wood and Brown (2011). Observations of vortex position and V 0 are interpolated via a polynomial fit at 10-s intervals to facilitate calculations at time steps between LIDAR sweeps (the polynomial fit to the positions of V1 and V2 used in these models are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Surface Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Davies-Jones and Wood [34] utilized exact solutions of the Navier-Stokes or Euler equations of motion and the continuity equation in cylindrical coordinates for 3D, axisymmetric, inviscid, or laminar flows to represent evolving vortices that roughly model tornado cyclones or misocyclones contracting to tornadoes. These solutions are unsteady versions of the diffusive Burgers-Rott vortex and the inviscid Rankine-combined vortex.…”
Section: Analysis Of the Vortexmentioning
confidence: 99%