2003
DOI: 10.1121/1.1543929
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simplified models of flue instruments: Influence of mouth geometry on the sound source

Abstract: Flue instruments such as the recorder flute and the transverse flute have different mouth geometries and acoustical response. The effect of the mouth geometry is studied by considering the aeroacoustical response of a simple whistle. The labium of a transverse flute has a large edge angle (60 degrees) compared to that of a recorder flute (15 degrees). Furthermore, the ratio W/h of the mouth width W to the jet thickness h can be varied in the transverse flute (lips of the musician) while it is fixed to a value … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
53
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…15 For high Strouhal numbers or thick jets, i.e., when a discrete vortices description seems more appropriate, the initialization of a new vortex at the flue exit is triggered by the change of direction (sign) of the acoustic velocity. 17 There is no simple model for predicting the receptivity. For this reason, the empirical expression for the receptivity proposed by de la Cuadra 31 based on the Schlieren visualization of a jet flowing in a transverse acoustical field is used.…”
Section: Receptivity Of the Jetmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…15 For high Strouhal numbers or thick jets, i.e., when a discrete vortices description seems more appropriate, the initialization of a new vortex at the flue exit is triggered by the change of direction (sign) of the acoustic velocity. 17 There is no simple model for predicting the receptivity. For this reason, the empirical expression for the receptivity proposed by de la Cuadra 31 based on the Schlieren visualization of a jet flowing in a transverse acoustical field is used.…”
Section: Receptivity Of the Jetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 Different models, that are based on an accurate description of the jet behavior, describe the sound generation for different blowing conditions and different window geometries. 17 However, the understanding of the different elements that contribute to the oscillation in flute-like instruments has now grown to a point where it becomes difficult to predict the influence of some specific aspects of the model on the oscillation. This difficulty arises because the system is looped and a global resolution of the equations describing and coupling the different elements is lacking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1), which is based on the vortex sound theory, provides a general approximation for the calculation of the acoustic power. It should be noted that recent studies suggest that the flow-acoustic coupling for the cases of the narrow main duct are more accurately described by a jet-drive model (Dequand, 2003b).…”
Section: Acoustic Power Calculationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…(11), has been revealed by measurement of the deflection amplitude by hot-wire anemometry [31] and visualization [32,33]. The effects of the flue geometry [34] and the edge angle [35] on the stability of the jet deflection have been investigated in flow visualization experiments. Recently, an edgetone theory by Holger et al [36] has drawn attention as a means of analyzing the jet deflection.…”
Section: Air-jet Driven Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%