2019
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz937
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

simba: Cosmological simulations with black hole growth and feedback

Abstract: We introduce the Simba simulations, the next generation of the Mufasa cosmological galaxy formation simulations run with Gizmo's meshless finite mass hydrodynamics. Simba includes updates to Mufasa's sub-resolution star formation and feedback prescriptions, and introduces black hole growth via the torque-limited accretion model of Anglés-Alcázar et al. (2017a) from cold gas and Bondi accretion from hot gas, along with black hole feedback via kinetic bipolar outflows and X-ray energy. Ejection velocities are ta… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

61
945
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 832 publications
(1,009 citation statements)
references
References 166 publications
61
945
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Assuming this type of prescription has the advantage that it is a relatively simple parametrisation of black hole accretion. In addition, this type of accretion is commonly assumed in almost every state-of-the-art cosmological simulation (e.g., in EAGLE (Schaye et al 2015), HORIZON-AGN (Dubois et al 2014),ILLUSTRIS-TNG (Weinberger et al 2017), MASSIVE-BLACK (Di Matteo et al 2012), BLUE-TIDES (Feng et al 2016)) with the exception of the SIMBA simulations (Davé et al 2019). This allows us to connect our results with other studies.…”
Section: Numerical Setupsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Assuming this type of prescription has the advantage that it is a relatively simple parametrisation of black hole accretion. In addition, this type of accretion is commonly assumed in almost every state-of-the-art cosmological simulation (e.g., in EAGLE (Schaye et al 2015), HORIZON-AGN (Dubois et al 2014),ILLUSTRIS-TNG (Weinberger et al 2017), MASSIVE-BLACK (Di Matteo et al 2012), BLUE-TIDES (Feng et al 2016)) with the exception of the SIMBA simulations (Davé et al 2019). This allows us to connect our results with other studies.…”
Section: Numerical Setupsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Recent studies (e.g. Bekki 2013;Mancini et al 2016;McKinnon et al 2016McKinnon et al , 2017McKinnon et al , 2018Aoyama et al 2017;Hirashita et al 2018;Gjergo et al 2018;Davé et al 2019;Hou et al 2019) have implemented mechanisms for tracking dust production and destruction in hydrodynamical simulations. McKinnon et al (2016McKinnon et al ( , 2017 implemented a simplified dust model in the moving mesh code AREPO to investigate dust formation in a diverse sample of galaxies, accounting for thermal sputtering of grains.…”
Section: Previous Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for AGN feedback, the commonly pursued approaches consist in providing the feedback energy to the surrounding medium in the form of thermal or kinetic energy (e.g. Springel et al 2005;Sijacki et al 2007;Dubois et al 2010;Barai et al 2016), or with a combination of the two (Davé et al 2019). The recently pursued direction of investigation aims at simulating the effect of the radiative power of the AGN via the injection of thermal energy, while modelling the outcome of the mechanical power of the AGN by means of outflows in the form of kinetic feedback (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%