2007
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkm864
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SILVA: a comprehensive online resource for quality checked and aligned ribosomal RNA sequence data compatible with ARB

Abstract: Sequencing ribosomal RNA (rRNA) genes is currently the method of choice for phylogenetic reconstruction, nucleic acid based detection and quantification of microbial diversity. The ARB software suite with its corresponding rRNA datasets has been accepted by researchers worldwide as a standard tool for large scale rRNA analysis. However, the rapid increase of publicly available rRNA sequence data has recently hampered the maintenance of comprehensive and curated rRNA knowledge databases. A new system, SILVA (fr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
4,462
0
14

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5,756 publications
(4,481 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
5
4,462
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…This resulted in 12,041,000 sequences distributed over 36 coral fragments [3 coral replicates × 4 conditions (control vs. DOC; control vs. DON) × 3 time points] and 36 water samples [3 seawater replicates × 4 conditions (control vs. DOC; control vs. DON) × 3 time points]. Remaining sequences were aligned against the SILVA database (release 119; Pruesse et al., 2007)) and preclustered (2 bp difference; Huse, Welch, Morrison, & Sogin, 2010). Chimeric sequences were removed using the UCHIME command (Edgar et al., 2011).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This resulted in 12,041,000 sequences distributed over 36 coral fragments [3 coral replicates × 4 conditions (control vs. DOC; control vs. DON) × 3 time points] and 36 water samples [3 seawater replicates × 4 conditions (control vs. DOC; control vs. DON) × 3 time points]. Remaining sequences were aligned against the SILVA database (release 119; Pruesse et al., 2007)) and preclustered (2 bp difference; Huse, Welch, Morrison, & Sogin, 2010). Chimeric sequences were removed using the UCHIME command (Edgar et al., 2011).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…sequences that appeared only once in the whole dataset, were excluded from further analysis. The remaining sequences were aligned using the SILVA SSU database (release 108, Pruesse et al, 2007). All sequences were binned into Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs) and were clustered (average neighbor algorithm) at 97% sequence similarity (Stackebrandt andGoebel, 1994, Kunin et al, 2010).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the same data preprocessing, 276,360 bacterial sequences (ranging from 952 to 22,785 sequences per sample) and 121,357 fungal sequences (ranging from 708 to 9771 sequences per sample) from root samples were used for further analysis. For bacteria, after removal of primers, all sequences were aligned with the Silva-ARB database (version 119, Pruesse et al 2007). After chimeras were removed, all sequences were clustered into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) at 97 % identity threshold by using the unsupervised Bayesian clustering algorithm CROP (Hao et al 2011), and all OTUs were included in downstream analyses.…”
Section: Sequence Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%