2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2021.120145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Silicate melt inclusions in the new millennium: A review of recommended practices for preparation, analysis, and data presentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 227 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results illustrate the importance of documenting not only the focused spot size used in V XAFS analysis of silicate glasses but the incident flux as well, so that the flux density can be estimated. This is a recommendation that has also been made for all XAFS analyses of magmatic melt inclusions (Rose-Koga et al 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results illustrate the importance of documenting not only the focused spot size used in V XAFS analysis of silicate glasses but the incident flux as well, so that the flux density can be estimated. This is a recommendation that has also been made for all XAFS analyses of magmatic melt inclusions (Rose-Koga et al 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Full analytical and calculation details are in Supplementary Material. Data collection and reporting for melt inclusions broadly follows the guidelines of Rose-Koga et al (2021).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Major elements in melt inclusions and olivines were measured by electron microprobe using a Cameca SXFive-TACTIS at the Laboratoire Magmas et Volcans (Clermont-Ferrand, France). Melt inclusions were analyzed using a defocused 10 μm beam, at 8 nA and 15 kV, whereas olivine grains were measured with a focused beam at 15 nA and 15kV, following the procedure described in Rose-Koga et al (2021). Sulfur and Cl were also determined in melt inclusions using a 10-μm beam at 40 nA, 15 kV.…”
Section: Electron Microprobementioning
confidence: 99%