2018
DOI: 10.1177/0305829818771349
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Silent Order: the Temporal Turn in Critical International Relations

Abstract: Recently, more and more International Relations (IR)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(35 reference statements)
0
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, the circulation of affect is transient because the interplay of place and bodies limits the time of practices. However, time is not only an element of affect due to the ephemerality of practices but time also provides a standard for orientation, direction, and meaning (Guillaume and Huysmans, 2019;Hom, 2018). This, what can be called 'rhythm' (Solomon, 2019;Solomon and Steele, 2017;Wetherell, 2012) in reference to Henri Lefebvre's particularly apt terminology when writing about dance, implies that to affect others, practices have to be temporarily situated within a specific socio-political and cultural context (Hutchison, 2019: 290).…”
Section: Place Time and Bodiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the circulation of affect is transient because the interplay of place and bodies limits the time of practices. However, time is not only an element of affect due to the ephemerality of practices but time also provides a standard for orientation, direction, and meaning (Guillaume and Huysmans, 2019;Hom, 2018). This, what can be called 'rhythm' (Solomon, 2019;Solomon and Steele, 2017;Wetherell, 2012) in reference to Henri Lefebvre's particularly apt terminology when writing about dance, implies that to affect others, practices have to be temporarily situated within a specific socio-political and cultural context (Hutchison, 2019: 290).…”
Section: Place Time and Bodiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent moves within the discipline of international relations (IR) have sought to emphasize the role of temporality and time within global and international politics (Agathanagelou and Killian, 2016;Berenskoetter, 2011;Debrix, 2015;Fisher, 2013;Hom, 2010Hom, , 2016Hom, , 2018aHom, , 2018bHutchings, 2008;Lundborg, 2012Lundborg, , 2015McIntosh, 2015;Solomon, 2014;Stevens, 2016;Stockdale, 2016;Wheeler, 2017). In the past few years, these efforts have grown significantly, primarily as an attempt to theorize an ontological assumption that has remained largely unexamined.…”
Section: Using the Present And Temporality As A Lens For Thinking Polmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Far from playing out one against the other, this paper tries to investigate how Foucault’s work can be helpful and inspiring in finding and further developing concepts employed as analytical tools to investigate the historical emergence and transformation of powerful social time-regimes. Here, power is not so much understood as being anchored in a particular form, design or object of time, but rather is fundamentally connected to practices of temporalization and timing, conceived in the immanence of social relations of knowledge–power (Foucault, 1995, see also Elias, 1992; Hom, 2018). Therefore, not only could Foucault scholars profit from a dialogue with pluri-temporal perspectives emergent from the field of critical time studies, but these also could gain central insights by making use of Foucauldian vocabularies of power (see for example Odih, 1999).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%