2019
DOI: 10.1111/ele.13349
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Signs of stabilisation and stable coexistence

Abstract: Many empirical studies motivated by an interest in stable coexistence have quantified negative density dependence, negative frequency dependence, or negative plant–soil feedback, but the links between these empirical results and ecological theory are not straightforward. Here, we relate these analyses to theoretical conditions for stabilisation and stable coexistence in classical competition models. By stabilisation, we mean an excess of intraspecific competition relative to interspecific competition that inhe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
97
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 101 publications
2
97
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Future challenges lie in uncovering the dynamic nature of feedback effects in time as well as in density-dependent competitive settings. Long-term density-dependent plant-soil feedback experiments will be vital assets in linking soil feedback fluctuations to plant community processes (Broekman et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future challenges lie in uncovering the dynamic nature of feedback effects in time as well as in density-dependent competitive settings. Long-term density-dependent plant-soil feedback experiments will be vital assets in linking soil feedback fluctuations to plant community processes (Broekman et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theoretically, coexistence is determined by comparing intra-and interspecific competition: one species has to limit itself more than limiting the other (Broekman et al 2019). However, weighted arithmetic means by population of each stage cannot fully represent competition experienced by a species in the current model: The most abundant stage (stage 1 juveniles) always experiences the most intense interspecific competition, resulting in overestimation of interaction strengths (Supporting Information, Section 2.1).…”
Section: Determination Of Competition Outcomementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, neutral models with a single interaction coefficient have adequately explained some patterns in ecological communities (Hubbell, ). In other cases, observations are better matched by models with separate intra‐ versus interspecific terms, reflecting that intraspecific effects often far outweigh interspecific effects (Adler et al, ; Broekman et al, in press). Alternatively, in some microbial and plant systems, models that include pairwise interactions among species produce more accurate estimates of species abundances (Carrara et al, ; Clark, Lehman, & Tilman, ; Vandermeer, ), potentially indicating species‐specific impacts on resource availability (Tilman, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%