1995
DOI: 10.1002/pro.5560041212
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Significant discrepancies between van't hoff and calorimetric enthalpies. II

Abstract: Isothermal calorimetric titration of 18-crown-6 ether with BaClz in pure aqueous solution over the temperature range 7-40 "C gives precise binding constants and enthalpy changes. Nonlinear least-squares fitting of the binding constants to the integrated van't Hoff equation, including a temperature-independent change in heat capacity, leads to van't Hoff enthalpies that differ significantly from the observed calorimetric enthalpies. This perplexing discrepancy appears at present to be very widely occurring. Key… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
64
3

Year Published

1996
1996
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
64
3
Order By: Relevance
“…ions to 18-crown-6 ether were found slightly higher than the values reported in the literature, by approximately 0.5% [4] and 1.5% [5,6]. These differences lie within the limits of the measurement accuracy.…”
Section: +supporting
confidence: 48%
“…ions to 18-crown-6 ether were found slightly higher than the values reported in the literature, by approximately 0.5% [4] and 1.5% [5,6]. These differences lie within the limits of the measurement accuracy.…”
Section: +supporting
confidence: 48%
“…Such discrepancies have been reported previously in the literature for protein-ligand binding. [578][579][580] While a rigorous comparison of thermodynamic values obtained from the two techniques is not possible because so few directly comparable data are available in the literature, we believe that calorimetry is the best technique for measuring the dissected thermodynamics for protein-ligand association for reasons discussed in section 10.2.2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ITC can thus determine both the free energy and the enthalpy of binding; and the entropy of binding can be determined from these two values (TDS o = DH o -DG o ). Because ITC is carried out at one temperature (and so without concerns for changes in protein structure with temperature, and without assuming the change in heat capacity upon complexation is independent of temperature), it generates much more reliable thermodynamic information for biological systems than does van't Hoff analysis, which requires measurements at different temperatures [66][67][68][69]. For thermodynamic analysis of multivalent systems, the accuracy provided by ITC is essential in understanding both the entropic and enthalpic contributions to binding, in determining the thermodynamic advantage gained from multivalency (relative to monovalency), and in assessing the cooperativity of the system (Section 2.4.4).…”
Section: Isothermal Titration Calorimetrymentioning
confidence: 99%