2010
DOI: 10.4054/demres.2010.23.4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sibship size and status attainment across contexts: Evidence from the Netherlands, 1840-1925

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Empirical studies have also confirmed that smaller family sizes in the demographic transition became increasing connected to socioeconomic upward mobility among children (Bras, Kok, and Mandemakers 2010;Van Bavel 2006, Van Bavel et al 2011. It may be expected that this shift toward increased investments in child quality would have occurred first among the higher status groups, partly because of the higher returns on education for people in higher status occupations, and partly because of the greater degree of knowledge and information about the new conditions among the members of these socioeconomic groups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Empirical studies have also confirmed that smaller family sizes in the demographic transition became increasing connected to socioeconomic upward mobility among children (Bras, Kok, and Mandemakers 2010;Van Bavel 2006, Van Bavel et al 2011. It may be expected that this shift toward increased investments in child quality would have occurred first among the higher status groups, partly because of the higher returns on education for people in higher status occupations, and partly because of the greater degree of knowledge and information about the new conditions among the members of these socioeconomic groups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…In the urban working class children’s labour contribution remained important longer and may have contributed to a delayed decline in fertility. Empirical studies have also confirmed that smaller family sizes in the demographic transition became increasingly connected to socioeconomic upward mobility for children (Van Bavel 2006; Bras et al 2010; Van Bavel et al 2011; Molitoris 2015).…”
Section: Theory and Previous Researchmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The resources that can be assigned to each child in the household is, therefore, seen as dependent on the total amount of resources and the number of children (Downey, 2001). Although several scholars have uncovered extensive empirical evidence which is consistent with the resource-dilution model (Black, Devereux, & Salvanes, 2005;Booth & Kee, 2008;Downey, 1995;Dribe, Campbell, & Van Bavel, 2012;Steelman, Powell, Werum, & Carter, 2002), the number of empirical studies that challenge it is growing (Bras, Kok, & Mandemakers, 2010;Chu, Xie, & Yu, 2007;Li, Zhang, & Zhu, 2008;Lu & Treiman, 2008;Marteleto & de Souza, 2012;Shavit, Pierce, & Pierce, 1991;Yu, Su, & Chiu, 2012). These studies demonstrate that it is too simplistic to assume that the parental couple is the unit that decides on the distribution of resources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%