19th IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium
DOI: 10.1109/ipdps.2005.401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Siamese-Twin: A Dynamically Fault-Tolerant Fat-Tree

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The work proposed in [14] uses two parallel fattrees with crossover links between the switches at the same position of each network to provide dynamic faulttolerance, but at a high hardware cost. In [15], the authors use several parallel MINs to create redundancy without any interconnecting link between them, also increasing the hardware cost of the network.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The work proposed in [14] uses two parallel fattrees with crossover links between the switches at the same position of each network to provide dynamic faulttolerance, but at a high hardware cost. In [15], the authors use several parallel MINs to create redundancy without any interconnecting link between them, also increasing the hardware cost of the network.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the probability of failure of an individual component is low, the probability of any of the multitude of components making up the interconnection network failing quickly becomes nonnegligible as the network size increases [6]. Furthermore, CMOS devices are becoming increasingly susceptible to external effects such as electrical noise, process variation, and natural radiation [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With migration toward high-radix routers, the lower-radix topologies and their routing scheme such as the cyclic Banyan networks are no longer suitable. The simple adaptive routing schemes for the dynamic fault tolerance of fat-trees were proposed [6,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this technique, if a given destination is not reachable due to faults in one of the networks, packets to that destination are sent through any of the other parallel MINs. In [116], a new topology that consists of two parallel fattrees with crossover links between the switches in the same position in both networks is proposed. In this topology, when a packet encounters a fault in its path, it is forwarded through the crossover link to the other parallel fat-tree.…”
Section: Fault-tolerance In Minsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, larger buffers can be introduced, doubling switch storage capability, thus keeping the same buffer resources of the fat-tree. Another possibilities are to replicate the network to deal with higher traffic loads like in [21], or to provide fault-tolerance like in [116].…”
Section: Advantages and Disadvantagesmentioning
confidence: 99%