2012
DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2012.713336
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shrinkage, Metropolization and Peripheralization in East Germany

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
62
0
5

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
62
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…When it comes to location decisions of firms, administrative functions and infrastructures, other regions are preferred because actors from non-core regions are not proactively participating in the underlying formal and informal processes of decision-making. In addition, (collective) self-images in peripheralized regions often lead to mental 'lockins' promoting and re-producing negative regional imaginations (Grabher, 2003;Lang, 2012;Meyer et al, 2016). Picking up these arguments for non-core regions, we establish four propositions to better understand core versus non-core regions based on the proposed social constructivist perspective.…”
Section: Imaginations Of Space: Understanding Core and Non-core Regionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When it comes to location decisions of firms, administrative functions and infrastructures, other regions are preferred because actors from non-core regions are not proactively participating in the underlying formal and informal processes of decision-making. In addition, (collective) self-images in peripheralized regions often lead to mental 'lockins' promoting and re-producing negative regional imaginations (Grabher, 2003;Lang, 2012;Meyer et al, 2016). Picking up these arguments for non-core regions, we establish four propositions to better understand core versus non-core regions based on the proposed social constructivist perspective.…”
Section: Imaginations Of Space: Understanding Core and Non-core Regionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The transition period saw an increase in the growth of capitals and other big cities while the rural settlements have depopulated and degraded. This growing territorial polarisation has led to increased attention being paid to lagging regions (Czyz, 2002;Grossmann et al, 2008;Pallagst, 2010;Reckien and Martinez-Fernandez, 2011;Lang, 2011Lang, , 2012. The researchers underline the negative polarisation trends, stressing that such territorial unevenness results in the emergence of areas of growth and stagnation.…”
Section: Regional Disparities In Depopulating Territories In Post-socmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although such market-oriented logic can explain the emergence of economic peripheries, it provides a limited basis for developing planning strategies aimed at addressing spatial misbalances and tackling development issues under weak structural conditions. Critics attempt to address these limitations by conceptualizing 'peripheralization' as a more complex process shaped by the power relations between the core and periphery, by cultural perceptions, and by the evolution of regional economies in the context of national and international connections (Lang, 2012(Lang, , 2015Lang, Henn, Sgibnev, & Ehrlich, 2015). Peripheralization should be considered as a multidimensional process, a result of complex interactions between political, social and economic forces (Kühn, 2015, p. 373).…”
Section: Alternative Conceptualisationsmentioning
confidence: 99%