2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2011.01.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Should intentional endovascular stent-graft coverage of the left subclavian artery be preceded by prophylactic revascularisation?

Abstract: Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has emerged as a promising therapeutic alternative to conventional open aortic replacement but it requires suitable proximal and distal landing zones for stent-graft anchoring. Many aortic pathologies affect in the immediate proximity of the left subclavian artery (LSA) limiting the proximal landing zone site without proximal vessel coverage. In patients in whom the distance between the LSA and aortic lesion is too short, extension of the landing zone can be obtained… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
45
1
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(126 reference statements)
1
45
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, Walker et al suggested that the majority of patients with SCSS have neurological symptoms actually due to other vascular lesions [24]. This can explain that the only patient who developed a neurologic complication is the only aged one from our four patients, with the possibility that the manifestation of the condition is probably dependent on the patency of the other cranial arteries which we should have checked as many teams do [25][26][27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Furthermore, Walker et al suggested that the majority of patients with SCSS have neurological symptoms actually due to other vascular lesions [24]. This can explain that the only patient who developed a neurologic complication is the only aged one from our four patients, with the possibility that the manifestation of the condition is probably dependent on the patency of the other cranial arteries which we should have checked as many teams do [25][26][27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Although endovascular deployment of an occluder was a simple and safe method, we could not use these commercial devices in Japan. LSA coverage is often necessary to perform proximal seal in up to 40% of patients treated with TEVAR [4,5]. In our case we performed coil embolization to prevent type II endoleak and bypass between left common carotid artery and left subclavian artery with 6 mm ePTFE graft because of the hypo-plastic left vertebral artery and his dominant was the left.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 2009 consensus from the Society of Vascular Surgery described the quality of the existing evidence on the performance of subclavian revascularisation in patients undergoing TEVAR as low (2C) [10]. A 2011 literature review from the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, which resulted in the formulation of recommendation of prophylactic LSA revascularisation in elective patients, was based on numerous and heterogeneous series with small samples of patients [11]. Studies in support of routine preoperative LSA revascularisation show that the coverage of the LSA during TEVAR is associated with an increased risk of stroke, paraplegia and arm ischaemia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%