2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2012.01196.x
View full text | Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: Anthropology and the other cognitive science (CS) subdisciplines currently maintain a troubled relationship. With a debate in topiCS we aim at exploring the prospects for improving this relationship, and our introduction is intended as a catalyst for this debate. In order to encourage a frank sharing of perspectives, our comments will be deliberately provocative. Several challenges for a successful rapprochement are identified, encompassing the diverging paths that CS and anthropology have taken in the past, t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(34 reference statements)
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But beyond this rehabilitation of the specific systems and their users, this “exotic” phenomenon is of more general relevance to the cognitive sciences. It also serves as an instance of the recursive process in which cultural tools and cognitive achievements advance each other and thus as an instance of the “ratchet effect” (Tomasello, 1999; and see Wiese, 2003) of culture more generally, which also highlights the importance of anthropological insights for cognitive science theorizing (Beller et al, 2012). By their mere existence and usage, cultural tools may promote cognitive advancement.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But beyond this rehabilitation of the specific systems and their users, this “exotic” phenomenon is of more general relevance to the cognitive sciences. It also serves as an instance of the recursive process in which cultural tools and cognitive achievements advance each other and thus as an instance of the “ratchet effect” (Tomasello, 1999; and see Wiese, 2003) of culture more generally, which also highlights the importance of anthropological insights for cognitive science theorizing (Beller et al, 2012). By their mere existence and usage, cultural tools may promote cognitive advancement.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper has shown that computational linguistic techniques allow us to localize artifacts bearing an ancient script, demonstrating that techniques commonly used in the cognitive sciences to measure geographical and social relations in the present can also be used to provide a glimpse into the organization of societies from the past. The emerging field of computational anthropology (Gloor et al, 2015) might provide the cognitive science community with a recalibration of the field (Beller, Bender, & Medin, 2012). The emerging field of computational anthropology (Gloor et al, 2015) might provide the cognitive science community with a recalibration of the field (Beller, Bender, & Medin, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In attempting to understand but also to measure people's relationships and knowledge of nature and supernatural beings, we draw from the fields of cross‐cultural psychology and cognitive anthropology. Anthropologists have advocated and demonstrated the feasibility and the benefit of a multidisciplinary approach (see Beller, Bender & Medin ; Bender, Beller & Medin ; Cohen ). The combination of anthropological and psychological approaches has been particularly fruitful for the study of religious beliefs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%