2019
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.122.083603
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shot-Noise-Limited Nanomechanical Detection and Radiation Pressure Backaction from an Electron Beam

Abstract: Detecting nanomechanical motion has become an important challenge in Science and Technology. Recently, electromechanical coupling to focused electron beams has emerged as a promising method adapted to ultra-low scale systems. However the fundamental measurement processes associated with such complex interaction remain to be explored. Here we report highly sensitive detection of the Brownian motion of µm-long semiconducting nanowires (InAs). The measurement imprecision is found to be set by the shot noise of th… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…33 The deposited mass is tracked in real time by monitoring frequency changes of the noise-driven oscillations of the nanotube resonator. Measuring the nanomechanical vibrations relies on e-beam electromechanical coupling 34,35 and is accomplished using the same electron-beam 2 as that used for FEBID. We demonstrate the high sensitivity and versatility of this method, which enables us to address mass changes over more than six orders of magnitude, with a resolution down to the zg range.…”
Section: Tron Microscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…33 The deposited mass is tracked in real time by monitoring frequency changes of the noise-driven oscillations of the nanotube resonator. Measuring the nanomechanical vibrations relies on e-beam electromechanical coupling 34,35 and is accomplished using the same electron-beam 2 as that used for FEBID. We demonstrate the high sensitivity and versatility of this method, which enables us to address mass changes over more than six orders of magnitude, with a resolution down to the zg range.…”
Section: Tron Microscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Definitions of electron microscope noise can include statistical noise [128][129][130][130][131][132][133][134][135] , aberrations 136 , scan distortions [137][138][139][140] , specimen drift 141 , and electron beam damage 142 . Statistical noise is often minimized by traditional denoising algorithms 143,144 , including a variety of denoising algorithms developed for electron microscopy.…”
Section: Improving Signal-to-noisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides these optical schemes, electromechanical coupling of nanomechanical motion to focused electron beams has recently emerged as a feasible approach for transduction of vertical SCNWs without the need of specific arrangements. 30,31 However, in addition to the obvious practical limitations imposed by the operation inside a scanning electron microscope, the reported results indicate the presence of radiation pressure back-action effects that perturb the mechanical response of the nanowires. These effects can be of great interest in fundamental studies regarding dynamical cooling of macroscopic degrees of freedom to the quantum ground state, 30 but they may also introduce disadvantageous and complex phenomenology for practical applications.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Specifically, laser beam deflection schemes have been demonstrated only for nanowires with micron-sized nanowire tips and inverted cone nanowire geometries. , Also, an optical Bragg scattering readout has been recently applied to truly nanometer-scaled vertical nanowire arrays, but it required a periodic arrangement of the arrays and thus a specific nanofabrication process to provide such an arrangement. Besides these optical schemes, electromechanical coupling of nanomechanical motion to focused electron beams has recently emerged as a feasible approach for transduction of vertical SCNWs without the need of specific arrangements. , However, in addition to the obvious practical limitations imposed by the operation inside a scanning electron microscope, the reported results indicate the presence of radiation pressure back-action effects that perturb the mechanical response of the nanowires. These effects can be of great interest in fundamental studies regarding dynamical cooling of macroscopic degrees of freedom to the quantum ground state, but they may also introduce disadvantageous and complex phenomenology for practical applications.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%