1996
DOI: 10.1016/s1059-0560(96)90025-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short-run and long-run dynamic linkages among international stock markets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
38
1
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
6
38
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The coefficient signs of the weekly data in equation (3) are consistent with the daily data in equation (2) but each estimated parameter is 2.2 to 2.5 times bigger than in equation (2). This implies that all these stock indexes behaved stronger relationship with the NZSEALL using weekly data.…”
Section: Johansen's Multivariate Cointegration Testsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…The coefficient signs of the weekly data in equation (3) are consistent with the daily data in equation (2) but each estimated parameter is 2.2 to 2.5 times bigger than in equation (2). This implies that all these stock indexes behaved stronger relationship with the NZSEALL using weekly data.…”
Section: Johansen's Multivariate Cointegration Testsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Although daily data captures speedy transmission of information during both short-and long-run dynamic linkages for stock market integration (see Hassan & Naka, 1996;and Voronkova, 2004), but such data creates the problem of data non-synchronization. Therefore, I have used relevant daily data on which all the nine stock markets were open for trading, and remove the data for the days in which trading was not occurred at least in one market.…”
Section: Data and Empirical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, investors who allocated some of their portfolio to share from other countries can increase the portfolio expected return with no increase in risk. The relationship between international stock price returns integrated have been investigated extensively (i.e, Stulz 1981, Jorion & Schmartz 1986, Taylor and Tonks 1989, Jeon and VonFurstenberg 1990, Arsharapalli and Doukas, 1993, Cheung and Ng 1992, Koop 1994, Lee and Kim 1994, Chowdury 1994, Arshanapalli, Doukas and lay 1995, Hassan and Naka 1996, Chaudhuri 1997, Lenchman 1998, Chen et al 2002, Diamands 2008, Wong et al 2005, Hoqut 2007, Li and Majerowskn 2008, Menon er al. 2009, Bastos and Caiado 2010, Park 2010, Subhani et al 2011, Horvah and Petrovski 2012, Tripathi and Sethi 2012, Thomas Dimpfl 2014, Srimivsan et al 2014.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%