2018
DOI: 10.1128/aem.02679-17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shigella sonnei Does Not Use Amoebae as Protective Hosts

Abstract: Shigella flexneri and Shigella sonnei bacteria cause the majority of all shigellosis cases worldwide. However, their distributions differ, with S. sonnei predominating in middle- and high-income countries and S. flexneri predominating in low-income countries. One proposed explanation for the continued range expansion of S. sonnei is that it can survive in amoebae, which could provide a protective environment for the bacteria. In this study, we demonstrate that while both S. sonnei and S. flexneri can survive c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the viable counts of S. sonnei and S. dysenteriae were higher in the presence of A. castellanii compared with the absence of the amoeba after 18 days of cocultivation [2]. In addition, S. sonnei and S. flexneri were able to survive in cocultures with A. castellanii over 18 days at 22°C [7].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For example, the viable counts of S. sonnei and S. dysenteriae were higher in the presence of A. castellanii compared with the absence of the amoeba after 18 days of cocultivation [2]. In addition, S. sonnei and S. flexneri were able to survive in cocultures with A. castellanii over 18 days at 22°C [7].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Saeed et al [2] reported that Shigella dysenteriae and S. sonnei could survive and replicate in the cytoplasm of A. castellanii. In contrast, in a recent study, it was showed that S. sonnei did not have the ability to survive or replicate inside the A castellanii and, as a result, A castellanii could not be a protective host for this bacterium [7]. Differences in the environmental conditions (such as temperature and the presence/absence of nutrients) and the physiological conditions of the bacteria can be the possible reasons for the different findings.…”
mentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The synergistic effect of antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) alongside with integrons (genetic elements that acquire or exchange exogenous DNA, called as gene cassettes by site-specific recombination) further increases the emergence and survival rate (Ahmed et al 2006 ). In another study ubiquitously existing, free living amoeba called Acanthamoebae castellanii has found to phagocytosize S. sonnei protecting it from chlorination and environmental damage (Saeed et al 2009 ), however, contrary to this, in a recent study, it has been shown that although A. castellanii phagocytosize S. sonnei but it does not be able to survive or grow in the cytosol of A. castellanii (Watson et al 2018 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, enhanced survival advantages. However, a recent study showed that S. sonnei is not able to use amoebae as a protective host to enhance its environmental survival, which makes the explanation of A. castellaniii protection for S. sonnei expansion compromised 4 . On the other hand, antibiotic resistance is thought to be associated with a fitness cost 5 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%