2008
DOI: 10.1029/2007jb005178
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shear wave splitting and mantle flow associated with the deflected Pacific slab beneath northeast Asia

Abstract: [1] A total of 361 SKS and five local S wave splitting measurements obtained at global and regional seismic network stations in NE China and Mongolia are used to infer the characteristics of mantle fabrics beneath northeast Asia. Fast polarization directions at most of the stations in the western part of the study area are found to be consistent with the strike of local geological features. The dominant fast directions at the eastern part, beneath which seismic tomography and receiver function studies revealed… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
149
2
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(166 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(112 reference statements)
12
149
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The BJT and HNS restuls are consistent with the results obsevered by LUO et al (2004) and Liu et al (2008). However, our results at most stations are not consistent with the results Figure 3 Transverse energy contour of SKS splitting analysis at station JNX in Capital area from two teleseismic events (a) and (b), and the transverse energy contour of the result after stacking (c), where the asterisk denotes the position of optimal parameter pair obsvered by Zhao and Zheng (2005), the inconsistency is possibly due to different SKS splitting measurement techniques and different data processing and selection criteria used by the studies.…”
Section: Results and Analysissupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The BJT and HNS restuls are consistent with the results obsevered by LUO et al (2004) and Liu et al (2008). However, our results at most stations are not consistent with the results Figure 3 Transverse energy contour of SKS splitting analysis at station JNX in Capital area from two teleseismic events (a) and (b), and the transverse energy contour of the result after stacking (c), where the asterisk denotes the position of optimal parameter pair obsvered by Zhao and Zheng (2005), the inconsistency is possibly due to different SKS splitting measurement techniques and different data processing and selection criteria used by the studies.…”
Section: Results and Analysissupporting
confidence: 82%
“…In western China, some scholars had conducted a series of researches on upper mantle anisotropy (LÜ et al, 1996;DING and ZENG, 1996;JIANG et al, 2001;WANG et al, 2007a;CHANG et al, 2006CHANG et al, , 2008. However, because of the insufficient data, the previous study of the upper mantle anisotropy in Capital area is preliminary (Zhao and Zheng, 2005;Liu et al, 2008;ZHENG and GAO, 1994;LUO et al, 2004). Since 2001, Capital Area Seismograph Network has accumulated a lot of broadband digital seismic data, which is greatly helpful to the seismological study on the upper mantle anisotropy and the related geodynamics in the study area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This thinning has been considered by some to be the result of subduction erosion [11]. Seismic anisotropy investigations of the upper mantle show that the time-delays of SKS splitting in the North China Basin are smaller than in the central and western parts of the uplift in neighboring parts of North China [12][13][14]. This evidence puts relative differences in lithosphere thickness in perspective.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…V sub is the absolute velocity of the subducting plate, V t is the trench migration velocity, V up is the overriding plate velocity, V d is the deformation rate in the back-arc region, V c is the convergence velocity, a s is the shallow dip angle, and a d is the deep dip angle Earthq Sci (2016) 29(4):243-258 245 3 Seismic anisotropy data in subduction zones Schutt and Fouch (2001) and Wüstefeld et al (2009) collected and compiled seismic anisotropy data from different studies. Several researchers, including Wirth and Long (2010) and Liu et al (2008), also discussed the quality of the data in their studies. High-quality seismic anisotropy data generally have a high signal-to-noise ratio, a clear waveform, elliptical particle motion, and linear or nearly linear corrected particles.…”
Section: Subduction Zones and Dszsmentioning
confidence: 99%