Sharing and building digital group histories

Shen, Chia; Lesh, Neal; Vernier, Frédéric; Forlines, Clifton; Frost, Jeana

doi:10.1145/587078.587124

Cited by 94 publications

(29 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…These explorations involved gathering data from a variety of sources including prior art HCI and CSCW literature describing existing digital tabletop systems, (e.g., Rekimoto and Saitoh, 1999;Streitz et al, 1999Streitz et al, , 2001; de Bruijn and RUSSELL KRUGER ET AL. Spence, 2001;Deitz and Leigh, 2001;Hancock and Booth, 2004;Shen et al, 2001Shen et al, , 2002Tandler et al, 2001;Stathis et al, 2002;Vernier et al, 2002), HCI and CSCW literature involving qualitative and quantitative studies focused on tabletop collaboration or single-user tabletop interaction, (e.g., Tang, 1991;Fitzmaurice, et al, 1999).…”

Section: The Impact Of Orientation On Collaborationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Roles of Orientation in Tabletop Collaboration: Comprehension, Coordination and Communication

Kruger

Carpendale

Scott

et al. 2004

Comput Supported Coop Work

103

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. In order to support co-located collaboration, many researchers are now investigating how to effectively augment tabletops with electronic displays. As far back as 1988, orientation was recognized as a significant human factors issue that must be addressed by electronic tabletop designers. As with traditional tables, when people stand or sit at different positions around a horizontal display they will be viewing the contents from different angles. One common solution to this problem is to have the software reorient objects so that a given individual can view them 'right way up.' Yet is this the best approach? If not, how do people actually use orientation on tables? To answer these questions, we conducted an observational study of collaborative activity on a traditional table. Our results show that the strategy of reorienting objects to a person's view is overly simplistic: while important, it is an incomplete view of how people exploit their ability to reorient objects. Orientation proves critical in how individuals comprehend information, how collaborators coordinate their actions, and how they mediate communication. The coordinating role of orientation is evident in how people establish personal and group spaces and how they signal ownership of objects. In terms of communication, orientation is useful in initiating communicative exchanges and in continuing to speak to individuals about particular objects and work patterns as collaboration progresses. The three roles of orientation have significant implications for the design of tabletop software and the assessment of existing tabletop systems.

show abstract

Section: The Impact Of Orientation On Collaborationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Roles of Orientation in Tabletop Collaboration: Comprehension, Coordination and Communication

Kruger

Carpendale

Scott

et al. 2004

Comput Supported Coop Work

103

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The familiar and lightweight action of touching a surface may also make it easier for people to take part in a social/public setting. User studies have shown how groups of people, new to tabletops, find it easy and enjoyable when sharing and assembling of sets of digital images for a variety of collaborative tasks (Huang & Mynatt, 2003;Ryall, Forlines, Shen & Morris, 2004;Scott, Grant & Mandryk, 2003;Shen, Lesh, Vernier, Forlines & Frost, 2002).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Equal Opportunities: Do Shareable Interfaces Promote More Group Participation Than Single User Displays?

Rogers

Lim

Hazlewood

et al. 2009

Human–Computer Interaction

101

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Yvonne Rogers is a cognitive scientist with interests in the human aspects of ubiquitous computing, the design of external representations and the critique of theory in HCI; she is a professor in the Department of Computing at The Open University, UK.Youn-kyung Lim is a design researcher with interests in understanding the nature of design practice, bringing experience-centered approaches into design of novel technologies, and connecting theory and practice; she is an assistant professor in the Department of Industrial Design at KAIST, South Korea.William R. Hazlewood is a computer scientist with interests in the implementation, use, and evaluation of ambient information devices; he is a PhD student in the School of Informatics at Indiana University, Bloomington, USA.Paul Marshall is a cognitive scientist with interests in the design and evaluation of novel technologies and representations for working and learning; he is a postdoctoral research fellow in the Department of Computing at The Open University, UK. Shareable Interfaces -3 - ABSTRACTComputers designed for single use are often appropriated sub-optimally when used by small co-located groups working together. Our research investigates whether shareable interfaces-that are designed for more than one user to interact with-can facilitate more equitable participation in co-located group settings compared with single user displays. We present a conceptual framework that characterizes Shared Information Spaces (SISs) in terms of how they constrain and invite participation using different entry points. An experiment was conducted that compared three different SISs: a physical-digital set up (least constrained), a multi-touch tabletop (medium) and a laptop display (most constrained). Statistical analyses showed there to be little difference in participation levels between the three conditions other than a predictable lack of equity of control over the interface in the laptop condition. However, detailed qualitative analyses revealed more equitable participation took place in the physical-digital condition in terms of verbal utterances over time. Those who spoke the least contributed most to the physical design task. The findings are discussed in relation to the conceptual framework and, more generally, in terms of how to select, design and combine different display technologies to support collaborative activities.Shareable Interfaces -4 - CONTENTS

show abstract

“…A number of tabletop systems have been designed to support image browsing and sharing. The Personal Digital Historian [21] is a tabletop penbased system that helps people construct, organize, navigate and share digital collections in an interactive multi-person conversational setting. SharePic [1] is a multitouch, gestural, and collaborative digital photograph sharing application for a tabletop, which was strongly influenced by the way physical photographs are handled and placed on physical tables.…”

Section: The Funky Coffee Tablementioning

confidence: 99%

Funky-Design-Spaces: Interactive Environments for Creativity Inspired by Observing Designers Making Mood Boards

Lucero

2015

Lecture Notes in Computer Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Sharing and building digital group histories

Cited by 94 publications

References 12 publications

Roles of Orientation in Tabletop Collaboration: Comprehension, Coordination and Communication

Roles of Orientation in Tabletop Collaboration: Comprehension, Coordination and Communication

Equal Opportunities: Do Shareable Interfaces Promote More Group Participation Than Single User Displays?

Funky-Design-Spaces: Interactive Environments for Creativity Inspired by Observing Designers Making Mood Boards

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About