2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.08.20.457115
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shared responsibility decreases the sense of agency in the human brain

Abstract: Distributing responsibility across several individuals in social decisions helps minimize a burden of responsibility for consequences of decisions. Here we investigated the neural expression of this effect using magnetoencephalography (MEG). Participants performed a reward-based learning decision-making task in contexts where their sense of responsibility over outcomes decreased with group size. An MEG outcome processing effect was reduced as a function of decreasing responsibility at 200ms post outcome onset … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 52 publications
(184 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is quite surprising as participants rated all three players at each trial and suggests that responsibility attributions do not rely on a purely additive process, making them prone to changes based on outcome valence and ownership. A limitation of our study, however, is that we did not ask for responsibility ratings before the outcome to compare shifts in responsibility from the moment of the decision to the outcome 24 . This could have allowed us to directly compare pre and post outcome responsibility based on ownership, and to assess whether there is a specific increase for positive outcomes and/or decrease for negative outcomes from a baseline prospective responsibility level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is quite surprising as participants rated all three players at each trial and suggests that responsibility attributions do not rely on a purely additive process, making them prone to changes based on outcome valence and ownership. A limitation of our study, however, is that we did not ask for responsibility ratings before the outcome to compare shifts in responsibility from the moment of the decision to the outcome 24 . This could have allowed us to directly compare pre and post outcome responsibility based on ownership, and to assess whether there is a specific increase for positive outcomes and/or decrease for negative outcomes from a baseline prospective responsibility level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%