2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2021.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shared leadership and project success: The roles of knowledge sharing, cohesion and trust in the team

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
82
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
2
82
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To minimize the common method biased effect, data were collected in time lag as recommended by Podsakoff et al (2003). We collected the data at three different points with a time lag of 3 weeks in each interval as done by previous researchers in similar contexts (Javed et al, 2017;Khan et al, 2020;Imam and Zaheer, 2021). In time 1 (T1), the data related to an independent (passive leadership) variable and demographics (age, gender, education, and experience) were collected.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To minimize the common method biased effect, data were collected in time lag as recommended by Podsakoff et al (2003). We collected the data at three different points with a time lag of 3 weeks in each interval as done by previous researchers in similar contexts (Javed et al, 2017;Khan et al, 2020;Imam and Zaheer, 2021). In time 1 (T1), the data related to an independent (passive leadership) variable and demographics (age, gender, education, and experience) were collected.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trust and collaboration are two central intrinsic values related to each other, where trust level influences the level of collaboration, which in turn contributes to the project's success (Bond-Barnard et al 2018). Although Imam and Zaheer (2021) concurred that trust and strong ties contribute to the project success through shared leadership, it could not explain the real motivation of project actors and its connection with other elements that could influence the governance of the projects. Together these studies provide important insights on how the factoring of trust and collaboration together with other project governance element could be the basis for better understanding in terms of project governance practices in the poverty alleviation programme.…”
Section: The Gap Of Project Governance In Poverty Alleviationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…psychological safety, Edmondson, 1999, sub-group strength, Gibson andVermueulen, 2003), cooperation, Tjosvold et al (2003), task interdependence, Widman and Mulder (2018) and team climate, Schneider and Barbera (2013); motivational team processesteam cohesion (e.g. Imam and Zaheer, 2021), team efficacy (Huang et al, 2017) and team conflict (Van der Haar et al, 2017) and team behavioral process (e.g. team self-regulation, Gevers et al, 2009) to understand the predictors of team learning.…”
Section: Theoretical Development and Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%