2017
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.96.064303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shape evolution in Kr, Zr, and Sr isotopic chains in covariant density functional theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
39
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
7
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The interplay between both mechanisms leads to the shape-phase transition in the Zr isotopic chain, which takes place between N = 58 and N = 60. Extensive theoretical studies within the IBM and the mean-field approach [32,33] describe the shape evolution in the whole mass region reasonably well and point out the uniquely pronounced, fast structural change of Zr isotopes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The interplay between both mechanisms leads to the shape-phase transition in the Zr isotopic chain, which takes place between N = 58 and N = 60. Extensive theoretical studies within the IBM and the mean-field approach [32,33] describe the shape evolution in the whole mass region reasonably well and point out the uniquely pronounced, fast structural change of Zr isotopes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The potential energy surface (PES) study as a function of the quadrupole deformation parameter is performed by the method of quadratic constraint 52 (see Ref. 53 for more details). Energies are normalized with respect to the binding energy of the global minimum such that the ground state has a zero MeV energy.…”
Section: Quadrupole Deformationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the interaction Gogny-D1S has also been used and an oblate-prolate transition is observed, passing from A = 98 to A = 100, resulting in a prolate shape with β ≈ 0.44 for 100 Zr. In[71] a relativistic EDF is considered, obtaining a general prolate-oblate coexistence for the deformed part of the Zr chain and, in the case of 100 Zr, also a spherical-prolate coexistence. Moreover, in the heaviest isotope the deepest minimum corresponds to the oblate one.In summary, a comparison between the realistic mean-field calculations and the IBM-However, in the IBM only the spherical and the prolate minima are present, which seems to be a limitation of the used approach.Most of the realistic mean-field calculations present an oblate shape (global minimum) for the heaviest isotopes while the IBM energy surface calculations always generate a prolate one.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%